44

I'm usually a "Sane Trump Theory" supporter, but I see no outcome where the US achieves strategic gains in this one. Even with successful leadership assassination and significant damage to Iran's current nuclear capabilities, it'll just be kicking the can down the road and galvanising even more the Iranian people against the US. There's no way an outright occupation of Iran will happen.

But most NATO substrates have also designated the IRGC as a terrorist org, which I think would imply that the offensive is somehow strategically important. I don't like the whole depoliticising "distraction from Epstein" narrative, but I'm struggling to come up with alternatives here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Marat@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I had a theory a little bit ago that this most recent sleeper cell offensive was resource intense, and if it doesn't actually result in some form of victory [whether nuclear, economic or oppurtunistic in nature] this deployment might be a last ditch effort to get something out of it, or if all else fails they would rather try to cripple the country than let it continue

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
44 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1231 readers
65 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS