view the rest of the comments
History
Welcome to History!
A community dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.
Rules:
-
Post about history. Ask a question about the past, share a link to an article about something historical, or talk about something related to history that interests you. Discussion is encouraged.
-
No memes. No ads. No promos. No politics. No spam.
-
No porn.
-
We like facts and reliable sources here. While sources like Quora/Reddit/Wikipedia can be great tools for quick searches, we do not allow such user-generated content as primary source. What’s wrong with Wikipedia?
NOTE: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban.
I'm not sure why either. He didn't even say those things can't exist. He just said there is no clear evidence for them yet, which is true enough.
I find Hancock entertaining, and he may even be right, but don't find any of his evidence sufficient to support the claims he is making. That could always change, in either direction. It is fun watching new evidence emerge.
Nah, everything Hancock says is too far fetched. He will NEVER be right