you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Exactly. The article doesn't say the first two shots were from the front, but they weren't necessarily life-threatening even if they were. The final shot came when the shooter was out of the way and no longer had any reason to fear for his life and, therefore, had no reason to fire a third time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment