57
submitted 1 month ago by Posadas@hexbear.net to c/guns@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 31 points 1 month ago

keltec's interest here is that the mechanisms can be slightly smaller, and reloading typically doesn't happen in self-defense shootings. if you need more than ~5 shots you don't need a hand gun you need comrades.

[-] Kefla@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Makes sense for the people who like that kind of thing I guess, but I don't want my gun to be small. Only thing a small gun is better at than a big gun is hurting your hands.

[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

yeah size and weight are carrying optimizations.

with my situation i think if a handgun is going to be beneficial i'm not so worried about it printing

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

Printing, you mean like showing under clothes or wearing a worn spot on pants?

[-] Dessa@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

Concealability and portability, no?

[-] BobDole@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Especially with it being a .380

[-] no_pretext@hexbear.net 3 points 4 weeks ago

Concealability for sure, smaller guns allow "Deep Carry" which makes them almost completely undetectable in contrast to larger guns that print easily and require restricting your choice of clothing.

Rhett Neumayer (Demonstrated Concepts) and Tessa Booth have content about this topic on YouTube for those who are interested.

[-] no_pretext@hexbear.net 3 points 4 weeks ago

Tbh I think it was a way to skip the difficult process of designing a working detachable magazine

this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

guns

2676 readers
3 users here now

“Under no pretext"

Rules (Under review):

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS