U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened to impose 200% tariffs on French wines and champagne, as French President Emmanuel Macron is reportedly set to refuse joining his “Board of Peace” on Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 7 months ago (13 children)

saying that European leaders “won’t push back too much.”

Defensive forces are already being deployed to Greenland as I type this and EU leaders have made it clear they will open fire on hostile US soldiers.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Not really many forces has been deployed, it’s more a political statement than deterrence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    Exactly this. A lot of people don't understand that. It's obvious that a handful of soldiers is not going to protect Greenland against an invasion of the biggest military on earth. That wasn't the goal. It was a not so subtle message reminding Trump that invading Greenland will have consequences. Judging by Trump's unhinged response this message was received.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    The German forces have already returned back home...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It was only a reconnaissance mission. 🤡

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago*

    EU leaders have made it clear they will open fire on hostile US soldiers.

    I don't believe this part.

    I'd rather think that normal civilians might shoot some of them, despite they are a very peaceful people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Incorrect. The American claim was that Denmark does not do enough to protect Greenland. The reaction to that was to increase the NATO presence on Greenland. Why this is being considered threatening behavior (when an ally does exactly what you ask of them) is because politicians want to play both sides of the argument. The hope is that every action can be spun in the press so they can get whatever outcome they please

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    The US already can expand its presence in Greenland legally. It is about annexation and no one is concealing anything, there is no subtlety. Announced to take Greenland right after having illegally kidnapping the president of Venezuela: this was and still is a direct threat from USA to Europe that they are willing to use force against NATO allies and nothing else.

  • source
  • parent