298
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
298 points (78.8% liked)
Memes
54597 readers
1233 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
There's no "indoctrination by rote." Again, the CIA tried to do this, and could not get it to work. This is a conspiracy theory. Further, whether or not I get paid to write what I do has no impact on the truth of what I say, like I already said it would just prove motivation for it, but the claims themselves are independent of that motive.
I understand critical thinking well enough, resorting to insults when you can't effectively counter the points I raise doesn't help your points, it hurts them rhetorically.
It is not an insult, it is fact. You are spouting rhetoric without actually thinking about what you relay. CIA tries over a small period in an experiment, bad results.
But Dude look up cults and how their leaders get them to do things like drink poison or murder for them. Or have a extreme group suicide bomb themselves. Indoctrination.
If you raise a kid and tell him everyday that black people are bad, they believe it and perpetuate it. Indoctrination.
You are being what the rest of the world criticizes China for doing to its citizens. Being single minded with out a way to see past the delusions, and regurgitate random info without actually disseminating the root of things.
Again, you thinking being paid or not doesn't change the merit , it absolutely does.
Just like when red state newspapers report on news: they have to slant it to favour the payer or you don't get paid. It's how control works.
If you don't see this, then that is highly unfortunate that you can't see the truth.
I think about what I write quite a lot, actually. People don't become indoctrinated, they license themselves to believe that that which they think is beneficial to them is good. The essay Masses, Elites, and Rebels: The Theory of "Brainwashing" explains this phenomenon quite well. I'm aware of suicide bombers, cults, etc, but these aren't a result of "reprogramming" or whatever you think China is doing, but instead due to people willingly believing that it's correct.
The rest of the world doesn't criticize China for this though, only westerners who've licensed themselves into thinking China is some dystopia. I haven't regurgitated random info, I've directly answered your claims and built up my own defenses for mine.
I'm aware of how bias works in media, but it doesn't mean that everything they say is wrong. If they said the sky is blue, it would be correct even if they were being paid to say so. What you believe about China comes from people paid to discredit it, after all, so your argument is more that we can't believe what anyone has to say if they are paid to say it.
This doesn't even matter here, though, as I don't get paid to do so.
Its funny how you disprove your own "mind control" narrative by attempting it and failing to do it.