171
Starfield is Bethesda's Least Buggiest Game to Date, Say Sources (insider-gaming.com)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/gaming@beehaw.org
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Bethesda never disappoints!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 years ago (5 children)

exactly, bethesda isnt as good as obsidian at making buggy games 😂 though it was with fo3s engine and its assets

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    For context, Bethesda provided minimal support to Obsidian and gave them an absolutely absurdly short development time frame to make the game in. I think it was only a year.

    The bugginess isn't all their fault. The game director even released a free mod or two after the game released to do some rebalancing and add a survival mode to it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    it was 100% obsidians fault. they agreed to the time, and they yet again were way too ambitious, like with kotor 2. its just who obsidian is, bad time management and bad ambition management. they do make great games but those are 2 real flaws they have

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    At least they no have MS money behind them so they can go that last mile and tidy things up now. Much like Bethesda here too, under Zenimax Starfield would have been out last year with all those bugs and issues still in place.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent