53
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/41340318
cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7264202
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
53 points (87.3% liked)
Flippanarchy
2085 readers
635 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lmao, glad Hexbear and ML are the devil to you but the racist framing of the bloody Telegraph can be taken at face value.
Maybe I'm too autistic or not white enough to understand this but I don't see how this racist framing makes them "look based".
They are hunting for Trump supporters, that's what is based.
The racist framing comes from a racist liberal publication, so we know when we read it that it is untrue. Therefore, the group of people being accused of being a "gang" look cool to us.
If you say so. Personally I'm not a fan of trying to spin a positive on literal racism.
To clarify, I think the positive spin here is for us to acknowledge that the article's framing is racist, but that WE can read it without perceiving being accused of being in a "gang" as an automatically negative thing.
I'm not sure if I'm expressing this very well, sorry. I think it's like how you see people who commit justified acts of resistance often being called "terrorists" by the media, so among leftists "terrorism" no longer has an automatic negative connotation because we associate it with resistance. However, we understand that the intent from the media in using this term is still to convey the negative connotation.