54
:soil-triangle:
(commons.wikimedia.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)
emoji
1408 readers
47 users here now
A workshop for the memes of production.
Submit new emoji here.
A good submission is:
- Visually clear at a small size (120 pixel width) [This does not mean upload the small image, this means upload the source image or full size cutout but test prior.]
- Have a transparent background to the greatest degree possible. This online tool can remove many backgrounds.
- Display a clear emotion or purpose
- If including text, should be properly sized to be readable
- "Evergreen" and not something that will be irrelevant after the next news cycle
- Formatted in PNG, GIF, or SVG to make our file optimization cycles easier. If svg initially, send svg in a seperately hosted link to WhyEssEff. Same with gif, as we render them as mp4 IIRC.
- Have proposed title as the title of the post, nothing more, nothing less.
- Post body should include a suggested category and keywords.
- Max height of 3 times the width.
Rules:
- No reactionary or reactionary-adjacent expressions. The purpose of an image is what it expresses. Some clear examples for this rule:
- Allowed: Broken fasces, burning stars-and-bars, rotated Mussolini
- Disallowed: Body-shaming, Pepes, gay-shaming the enemy (e.g. those pictures of Putin and Trump that libs love to post), certain hateful wojaks (even if recontextualized)
- If you think you have touched on a grey area, see rule 7 for how to litigate this.
- ~~Nothing Vaush-related is allowed~~
- To be honest, I broke this rule, so it's pretty much moot. Just run it by me first in DMs or matrix. Vaush is a bit of a dead horse, so to speak, so they're still generally discouraged. The qualification for a viable emote referencing his existence is more a matter of execution
-- @WhyEssEff
- To be honest, I broke this rule, so it's pretty much moot. Just run it by me first in DMs or matrix. Vaush is a bit of a dead horse, so to speak, so they're still generally discouraged. The qualification for a viable emote referencing his existence is more a matter of execution
- No desecration of religious imagery.
- This rule does not extend to the subordinate representations of religious symbolism present within the flags and/or iconography of nations, political parties, or militant groups.
- Nothing sexually explicit or overtly horny is allowed
- :hentai-free:
- No sectarianism in submissions. Pro-tendency content is fine, but we will not accept content degrading specific tendencies.
- No gore, no SA, no sui-bait. Nothing that could reasonably trigger a comrade.
- If you think you're touching on a grey area with a submission, message @whyesseff:matrix.org to clear it before you post.
- DISCLAIMER: Clearing does not necessarily mean that I'll add it, just that it's alright to submit and the rules will not be the barrier to its addition
-- @WhyEssEff
- DISCLAIMER: Clearing does not necessarily mean that I'll add it, just that it's alright to submit and the rules will not be the barrier to its addition
- No content that breaks the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.
Emoji are added to the codebase periodically. Emoji may or may not be accepted and the dev team has final decision.
All images submitted must be ones you have the right to share with the project. By posting images in this comm, you are agreeing that you have permission to share this image with the project.
Hexbear Code Of Conduct, ToS, Privacy Policy, etc all still apply.
Emote repository, periodically updated on the Hexbear Code-Op.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Does this account for organic matter at all? I confess to not knowing much about dirt.
soil texture and organic matter content have slight overlap, generally characterized as "loam" in texture descriptions. a soil with good organic matter content would be in the "loam" area.
soil, by volume is ~50% mineral-matter the rest being pore space for either air or water. of that 50%, just 5% of the total volume is generally organic matter. there are soil types that are higher, but they are like wetlands and swampy stuff like that, where condititons are anerobic and organic matter builds up. but that little 5% of organic has dramatic impacts on soil characteristics.
generally, though the 45% is what mostly determines the texture, which is some combination of sand, silt, and clay (organized from largest to smallest particle size). mostly texture dictates how water behaves. sandy soils drain faster, clay soils hold onto water more tightly.
silty-loam, sandy-clay, clayey-silt are all examples of terminology for describing a soil texture. this is the dominant methology for soil science in the US. at one point i was researching a move to somewhere in scotland and they have a different classification system that uses numbering, and i was in the process of trying to connect the dots. all that to say, soil characterization can be quite different in different parts of the world.
i think a lot of places use the triangle though.
i don't know why this line is cracking me up so much, the kinda goofy names and the matter-of-fact second statement. imagining a biologist going "well technically speaking it's a catty-weasel
"
there are so many possible configurations, they sort of have to jumble words. like if there was a series of tremors that rolled millions of cats into a millions of weasle colonies, and 10 novel combinations of mammal emerged along a gradient, it's easy to just mash the words based on ratios and call it a day. especially with soil formation, this blending has probably happened in 50 different ways within 5 miles of wherever you are.
also, the texture classification is a small (but crucial) part of the broader taxonomy, which is like the linnaean system for species. the "silty loam" is really just a last specific bit of a soil's full classification, which is also specific to a depth (aka horizon). a lot of the other parts are about factors affecting its formation. the full name/classification of a specific soil looks like:
Order, Suborder, Great Group, Subgroup, family, Seriesso the "silty loam" is like only part of the series section. below is a list of full soil classifications (the second column). they usually list things backwards (from series -> order).
a decade plus after classes, i remember off the cuff like maybe 3-4 soil orders (out of 12) and a few terms outside of textural classifications, but they indicate things like moisture regime, parent material, biota, how "weathered" they are... so if you have all the terms memorized (like i may have, once, for an exam) and see the name, you would be able to articulate a lot about the place... it's climate, its plant life, how prone it is to flooding, its historical context (is it an old stream bed, did it used to be something else, like a coastline or an eroded rock formation, etc).
it's a crazy system.
yesss i love learning