In many parts of Europe, it’s common for workers to take off weeks at a time, especially during the summer. Envious Americans say it’s time for the U.S. to follow suit.

Some 66% of U.S. workers say companies should adopt extended vacation policies, like a month off in August, in their workplaces, according to a Morning Consult survey of 1,047 U.S. adults.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 144 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (36 children)
  • [–] 45 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    That's because politicians are so far separated from the average American. Some of them are so old and senile and have been in power so long, they don't even realize how bad it is for the average American, and on top of that, because they don't think it's as bad as it is, they don't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    We don't have these things because 50% of the population is dumb as bricks and is voting against their own interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It's not even 50% tits our fucked up districts, and also it's gotten like this because of legislation to defund education. But younger voters are becoming more informed, change can happen. It will take effort and time though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    I have always wished that requiring congressmen work a minimum wage job in their district that they have to look for and apply to like the rest of us while out of session would do anything. Deal with some Karens to humble them properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    No. It's because the constitution effective abolishes democracy, by ensuring a two-party system.

    In the US democracy is limited to one coin toss worth of decision making once every four years. Add to that that their first-to-the-post system eliminates all election power to non-swing-states, that means ~40 of the states have no democratic input at all, and the rest has up to 15 bit worth of democratic input over their whole life time.

    Thus politicians have nothing to fear at all. They mess up, who cares? It's gonna be their turn after the next term limit anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    The Constitution doesn't employ a 2 party system and actually our founding fathers were against it. It has been put in place since then. I do think the electoral college system does cause issues though. We need a ranked choice system or something else where all votes have some value.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    The overwhelming majority of working class adults want these things, but also the overwhelming majority of working class adults also work for large corporations who do not want these things (because it costs them money/profits). Guess who has more money to buy off politicians? Walmart/Amazon/Target would work together to never let these beneficial policies go through congress. It would be worth it to them to spend literal billions to prevent it, because it would cost them billions in the long run.

    The sad reality is we don't really live in a democracy. It's an oligarchy that allows us to think we are in control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I have never understood why Americans doesn't have trade union?

    Like in Denmark we have trade unions where a working area is united like the health care area, have "FOA" there is trading "time off" payment and so on, for all in this area.?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    There are trade unions in the USA but the cultural difference compared to in a Scandinavian country is very striking, both in terms of American vs Scandinavians unions themselves but also their support. It would surprise many Scandinavians to learn that many Americans don't even want trade unions because it's for example commonly seen as that they interfere with career paths, promoting seniority at the cost of new blood or keep the wages low because individual wages can be affected.

    I think the culture collision here is that the whole idea behind unions in Scandinavia is to offer a stronger collective voice and bargaining actor to increase wages and other subjects that improves the standards and quality of life / motivation of their employees so that the relationship between the work place and the individual is less asymmetrical.

    But it's been a long journey and it still is even if unionizing in USA has seen an uptick in debates lately, because USA has a radical and capitalistic history where there are loud and influential voices that even asking for basic rights on a job can be seen as "greed" and the company looks for someone being less of a bother and not asking these questions instead. All due to weak unions, of course. Otherwise the company would of course lose too much in employee skills by excluding everyone having these demands (and already being union members) like the situation here in Scandinavia where this by consequence is simply not an option.

    This is at least my two cents of this entire situation from the "outside" also in Europe, please correct me if I'm wrong...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    98% of the people who vote are voting for repressive corporate culture.

    The people who don't vote can't afford to miss a day of work, and even if they did, they know the people they have to choose from won't do anything to change it.

    Therefore these polls are meaningless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    We have to have voting mail in and at the booths as federally mandated. Washington State and quite a few others do this and we get a pamphlet that lists each candidate, their website, a pic and their policies. This should be the bare minimum for every state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Oregon passed a minimum 40 hours of sick leave on top of vacation. That's what vote by mail and ballot measures get you.

    Hawaii has had socialized universal healthcare for like 50 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    They had universal healthcare in Hawaii? Where dd it go? I've never heard of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Per Google AI:

    Hawaii is the only state to have implemented near-universal health insurance. The Hawaii Prepaid Health Care Act, enacted in 1974, requires most employers to offer employees group health insurance. Hawaii does not have a specific law requiring individuals to have health insurance coverage.

    Hawaii is ranked #1 in the country for overall health and public health. According to U.S. News & World Report, Hawaii is the top state for healthcare. The ranking is based on 71 metrics across eight categories, including healthcare, education, and economy.

    The average health insurance cost in Hawaii is $421 per month for a 40-year-old across all plan tiers. The cheapest Silver health plan in every county in Hawaii is KP HI Silver 4000/45 from Kaiser Permanente. Individuals can get insurance directly from HMSA or through the federal health insurance marketplace at HealthCare.gov. Depending on your financial situation, you may be eligible for financial help, which is only available through the federal marketplace.

    -- My family over there tells me it's great.

    https://medquest.hawaii.gov/en/members-applicants/already-covered/health-plans.html#:~:text=In%20Hawaii%2C%20most%20of%20the,and%20Support%20(LTSS)%20benefits.&text=www.uhccommunityplan.com%2Fhawaii%2Dmedicaid%2Dplans.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    That's because Americans have no say in these issues. They're brainwashed (well, 1/2 is) to think those things are sOciAliSm, which apparently is bad despite many voters having socialized medicine that they love. It's the American way, convincing people that what they want is not in their best interest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I would say th other half is brainwashed too, your 2 party system sucks. Things won't get better if you have no choice in elections

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    There is no party of red and party of blue. It's all a single party of green. And it's not named after the color of trees.

    Edit: Green is the color of money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    The think tanks funded by rich people saying "They want to take away your guns/cows/statues etc" and "unions suck" are better at this than we are.

    We can want all we want, but a whole pile of the media is owned by the 1% and what they want is the status quo.

    Conservatism is literally, don't change anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Conservatism is literally, don't change anything.

    Not true. They also like regression.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Because the American Oligarchy do nothing to actually improve the lives of the average person and deflect, blame, and fear monger against the other party to distract from their own corruption. It's both sides of the political spectrum in this country and it's getting pretty old.

  • source
  • parent