you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

It's is still their own artistic sensibility that made the art, not the AI. You will always be inspired by other things while doing anything requiring creativity.
Would being inspired by Picasso suddenly make one art worthless? Of course not. So why would being inspired by an AI generated example make it any different ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    To compare using AI to getting inspired by Picasso is wild

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    They want to argue for AI, they just don't know how. Says it all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    It'd be on brand then - if they asked AI to write out an argument for them, they'd take credit for the whole essay & if found out, they'd claim it was what they wanted to convey anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments