480
Indie Game Awards Disqualifies Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Due To Gen AI Usage (insider-gaming.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/games@lemmy.world
413 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

Reality is that people on platforms like Reddit or Lemmy (or the tech side of the Fediverse in general) can be incredibly fervent about their AI hate, but they don’t represent the average people, whose work has become ever so slightly more convenient thanks to AI

According to research, the overwhelming majority of gamers across all ages and genders do hate genAI though:

Gamers Are Overwhelmingly Negative About Gen AI in Video Games, but Attitudes Vary by Gender, Age, and Gaming Motivations. - Quantic Foundry

In a recent survey, we explored gamers’ attitudes towards the use of Gen AI in video games and whether those attitudes varied by demographics and gaming motivations. The overwhelmingly negative attitude stood out compared to other surveys we’ve run over the past decade.
(...)
Overall, the attitude towards the use of Gen AI in video games is very negative. 85% of respondents have a below-neutral attitude towards the use of Gen AI in video games, with a highly-skewed 63% who selected the most negative response option.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Gamers also don't generally reflect the opinions of the entire population.

    The way the question is asked is also important. Obviously a majority will hate genAI slop, but a good (indie) game where the developer had absolutely no chance of hiring actual people (therefore no artist, software engineer, etc. was hurt in the process), now that's a different story.

    See this here for example. People are freaking out because AI was mentioned. Not because COE33 is a bad game (though I do think it's overhyped, personally), but because AI got mentioned - in a way that doesn't even affect them.

    Thing is, there are some malicious actors in the AI sphere, both for AI and against - and the ones against are pushing absolute BS stories to ragebait people and build "consensus" on AI being bad.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Gamers also don't generally reflect the opinions of the entire population.

    Oh, so it is the gamers who are anti-AI, and the artists who are in favor of it. That makes sense.

    where the developer had absolutely no chance of hiring actual people (therefore no artist, software engineer, etc. was hurt in the process)

    It's interesting to me how a project fronted by somebody without two nickels to contract an artist can use the power of AI to create assets they'd never otherwise be able to, but they're not replacing anyone; AI can't just make a bunch of assets that a person could. That's some black magic, right there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent