this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
614 points (94.6% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
321 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I am profoundly against the heavy handed tactics used in deploying them.

Ah yes, the heavy handed tactics of checks notes zero consequences to the people who didn't take it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol "zero consequences"?! They literally let this lady die because she didn't take it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A lack of privilege is not a consequence. Receiving an organ donation is a gift, not a right.

Fact of the matter is there are a lot of people waiting for organs, whomever you give it to somebody else is going to die. When you get an organ transplant you have to take medication that leaves you immuno compromised.

So you have two people in front of you in need of an organ but only one organ to give it out. One is up to date on all their vaccinations and has been following their doctors instructions. The other thinks they know better than their doctor and has refused to get vaccinations. Which one of these two people do you think will have a better chance of surviving longer once immnuo compromised from the transplant?

"Woman who refused vaccine gets organ transplant, dies of COVID a month later" is a much shittier headline.