you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 years ago (2 children)

The way it was worded basically said that it had to be the national motto, thereby not making it a religious text to bypass the concerns you mentioned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    What I don't understand is how the national motto can be a religious one without breaking the first amendment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment