783
submitted 5 months ago by hamid@crazypeople.online to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago

In the past I've heard the second opinion primarily from people who say that a system is intended to work in the way that it does. Which makes the statement tautological: The system is working exactly as it works. I find this view unconvincing.

[-] cmhe@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

There is a difference is saying "I does what it does" and "what it does is per design". The latter assigns a responsibility.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But you don't need to misuse language to assign responsibility. It is their responsibility for breaking the system. Saying the system was always designed for this removes responsibility.

[-] that_one_guy@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

The system being broken by design doesn't absolve anyone acting within it from the responsibility of their actions. No one is forcing anyone to game the system as effectively as possible to the detriment of the majority. Acknowledging the system itself is fundamentally broken is pointing out that its design rewards bad actors; bad actors are still acting badly and are responsible for those actions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
783 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

55566 readers
1230 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS