https://archive.is/BQF7L

Oh god the whole interview's more awkward than I thought. Besides, ofc, the AI incorporation

Here's a sample

Roose: Last year, activist fund and short seller Hindenburg Research came out with a report arguing, among other things, that Roblox was, “compromising child safety in order to report growth to investors.” One of the things they pointed to was that there had been a decline in your spending on trust and safety. You have denied that. Why? What did they have wrong?

Baszucki: Fun. Let’s keep going down this. And so, first off, Hindenburg is no longer in existence, correct? So, you should report on that. They went out of business for some reason. The other thing is, have you researched that information? Roose: Um ——

Smug ass ad profitum :kelly:

Baszucki: Because you’re asking me about this, I’m curious if you’ve done your own research.

Roose: I have, I have done some research about ——

Baszucki: And what’s your take on that?

Roose: Well, I’m asking you.

Baszucki: So it’s really interesting, because I think we’re diving into a situation where we’re getting better, better, better. But would you ask the same situation of someone who converted from maybe hypermanual labor making cars by hand to an assembly line? The assembly line might be infinitely better and at the same time not have so many people. So, I think what they’re referring to is moving more and more and more and more to A.I. Arguably, is it better to have A.I. systems reviewing every image, every piece of text, all of that, or to keep doing that manually? So I think that was a misnomer. And I think if you interview anyone in our safety team or safety systems, that would be just part of making our systems better.

Ah yes, cuz getting a US-based immature AI that confuses A with B is certainly comparable to a more controllable automation of industry a la PRC quality.