598

Cities Panic Over Having to Release Mass Surveillance Recordings (www.nakedcapitalism.com)

submitted 3 months ago by technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

63 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This gets us to the central problem of today’s surveillance state. No one running the cameras wants to be observed. One reason that city officials object to releasing Flock data, for example, must that they themselves are among the recorded. The cameras are on them too; they too can be tracked. Everything means everything for these everywhere cameras.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] zephiriz@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I am from the US. Don't know about anywhere else. AFAIK there is no law granting exemption to public officials. And any law that trys to restrict filming or dissemination of public information gets shot down because of the first amendment of the US constitution. That is a special law.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025

598 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

46429 readers

1299 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS