8
submitted 8 months ago by swordgeek@lemmy.ca to c/guitars@lemmy.world

OK, I am obviously not talking about Hawksbill tortoiseshell - so illegal it almost hurts to LOOK at a pick. So we have created a thousand analogues, including things like synthetic plastics (delrin, ultex, etc.) and polymerized natural proteins (galalith et al).

But there are green turtles which are entirely unthreatened, and have comparable shells. There are horns from a dozen animals which are made of keratin. There are HORSE HOOVES that get routinely trimmed. Why are these not being used to replace actual tortoiseshell, despite being chemically closest to it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] berty@feddit.org 7 points 8 months ago

Why should we? Synthetic picks have consistency. Similar to synthetic guitar nuts every pick is basically the same while having a lot of variety to choose from. Sure it's also way cheaper to mass produce.

[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Sorry, I meant why are the boutique pick makers using galalith - a processed natural product - instead of horn - also a natural product.

Realistically, I love my Primetones. I just got to wondering about it.

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)

guitars

5846 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/guitars! Let's show off our new guitar pics, ask questions about playing, theory, luthier-ship, and more!

Please bring all positive vibes to the community and leave the toxic stuff elsewhere.

Banner credit

Rules:


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS