“He did it. He threw the sandwich.”

That’s how the defense counsel for Sean Dunn, the man who threw a sub-style sandwich at a Border Patrol officer in Washington, DC, this summer began the federal trial against him Tuesday morning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

No. Remember that they could not get this through a grand jury. The Grand Juries are practicing Nullification for these incidents because the public is sick of Trump and ICE. They had to go with a lesser charge for it ... and this one stupid case will likely end this prosecutors career.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (1 child)
    
    ~~~~The fact they got a case at all says that people were still willing to allow a case.~~~~
    
    Edit: I was wrong, apparently they dropped it down to a misdemeanor so they didn't need to get it past a grand jury.
    
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Yes, a "no true bill" is where a grand jury does not have the 12 votes needed and is rare. It is said a grand jury could indict a ham sandwich. I do not know if this was a ham sandwich thrown, but there have been 8 "no true bill" votes in DC during Trumps shenanigans.

    That is saying something.

  • source
  • parent