▲ 224 ▼ Kat Abughazaleh indicted over protests outside Chicago-area ICE facility (www.msnbc.com) submitted 10 months ago by TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago (1 child) Yep just like manufacturing consent is a reason to indict someone permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AmidFuror@fedia.io -3 points 10 months ago (1 child) Are you saying it is a right, but you don't agree with it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago* (1 child) Actually I was walking right past what you were saying because I refuse to have this conversation. The actions depicted in every video I've seen of the incident do not constitute a threat to the officers or to property. The only reason this is being brought to a judge at all is because of politics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AmidFuror@fedia.io -4 points 10 months ago Yes, there seemed to be a disconnect. I think what you're saying is that the banging car windows is a pretense, and the real reason for the arrest is for exercising First Amendment rights. The reason given for the arrest is the banging and interference, and I thought you were saying those are protected. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io -3 points 10 months ago (1 child) Are you saying it is a right, but you don't agree with it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago* (1 child) Actually I was walking right past what you were saying because I refuse to have this conversation. The actions depicted in every video I've seen of the incident do not constitute a threat to the officers or to property. The only reason this is being brought to a judge at all is because of politics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AmidFuror@fedia.io -4 points 10 months ago Yes, there seemed to be a disconnect. I think what you're saying is that the banging car windows is a pretense, and the real reason for the arrest is for exercising First Amendment rights. The reason given for the arrest is the banging and interference, and I thought you were saying those are protected. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago* (1 child) Actually I was walking right past what you were saying because I refuse to have this conversation. The actions depicted in every video I've seen of the incident do not constitute a threat to the officers or to property. The only reason this is being brought to a judge at all is because of politics. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AmidFuror@fedia.io -4 points 10 months ago Yes, there seemed to be a disconnect. I think what you're saying is that the banging car windows is a pretense, and the real reason for the arrest is for exercising First Amendment rights. The reason given for the arrest is the banging and interference, and I thought you were saying those are protected. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io -4 points 10 months ago Yes, there seemed to be a disconnect. I think what you're saying is that the banging car windows is a pretense, and the real reason for the arrest is for exercising First Amendment rights. The reason given for the arrest is the banging and interference, and I thought you were saying those are protected. permalink fedilink source parent