you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

Actually I was walking right past what you were saying because I refuse to have this conversation. The actions depicted in every video I've seen of the incident do not constitute a threat to the officers or to property. The only reason this is being brought to a judge at all is because of politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago

    Yes, there seemed to be a disconnect. I think what you're saying is that the banging car windows is a pretense, and the real reason for the arrest is for exercising First Amendment rights.

    The reason given for the arrest is the banging and interference, and I thought you were saying those are protected.

  • source
  • parent