Please provide proof that this is in use at the PSF.
I suppose that
advance or promote DEI, or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws.
say everything.
To my understanding of the language (which is not my primary language) they simple ask that no DEI initiative is carried forward and that there is no violation of anti-discrimination laws, so what I read is that PSF is not confident that they will not be able to not carried forward some DEI initiative or to not violate anti-discrimination laws.
Assuming this is the only reason they pulled out and given the usual definition of "DEI"
Quotas for minorities are a very outdated practice and were used to break the most entrenched norms (women in C-suites).
Cinically speaking, only in cushy jobs...
More modern practices include preferring diversity between equally qualified candidates, ad retargeting and messaging efforts, and inclusive norms at workplaces.
Well, between equally qualified candidates (if really true) you can just toss a coin.
Also, diversity is profitable, it increases both innovativeness and productivity. It seems uniquely stupid to kneecap the economy to benefit your cronies.
Diversity could be profitable. Uniformity could be profitable.
The only thing that benefit economy is to choose the best candidate for a given work.
Then again, maybe that’s the whole point of the GOPedo platform: rob the commons.
Then good I am not from US.