you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 10 months ago* (4 children)

You seem to think criminals have actually reflected upon this. They might actually be idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I suppose I may be overestimating Louvre security. I guess I would assume a criminal might have to be somewhat smart to overcome what I presumed to be higher security than you might find at a typical target for idiot criminals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Oh yes, there's basically no security. At least nothing to deal with a quick grab like that. The only concern seems to have been terrorism. And even then,it was clearly not very well taken into account.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Curious why you got a downvote, if there's a good reason, I would have found a reply more informative...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Presumably because I said "no security ", which is a bit of an exaggeration. Very inadequate security would have been better. Supposedly there's a plan to upgrade the whole thing, but that should take a year or two still.

  • source
  • parent