1275
one bright second (mander.xyz)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Black holes aren't "dark"...

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 27 points 8 months ago
[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I suppose after a billion billion billion or so years, it probably would be

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 8 months ago

The light will eventually tire out and turn into radio waves or smth, I'm not a physicist

[-] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

To al elder God that sees higher bands of the electromagnetic spectrum it would see be a very bright place!

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

Any self respecting elder god would be playing billiards with the black holes. Fire up the new big bang, ye tatterdemalion layabouts!

[-] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

Is that because of the accretion disk?

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

And Hawking radiation. Hawking radiation is pretty "dark" for solar-mass scale black holes and up, but it can become relatively very intense for smaller holes.

For the holes we observe astronomically, the things we can see are the accretion disks and the orbits of stars around the black hole.

[-] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 months ago

But that happens because of matter falling into them, right? When they've already swallowed everything, there's not going to be accretion disks.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah, though eventually they should all evaporate one after another with a last huge tiny energy burst due to hawking radiation. But that will take a looooooooong ass time. And we still don't know (might never know) if hawking radiation is real.

[-] MotoAsh@piefed.social 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They said the same thing about the curvature of spacetime 100 years ago. Then it was proven like three years later.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
1275 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

20648 readers
1945 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS