you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 11 months ago (7 children)

GDP per capita is $24,810 vs $53,195. Although Poland's recovery after the fall of the iron curtain is great, there is no need to exaggerate.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    "In 1995 Poland’s GDP per capita was $13,600 in today’s money — about 36 per cent of Britain’s and roughly the same as Brazil’s. Today Poland’s figure is $44,500, or 81 per cent of ours. "

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

    Look anywhere else other than the article and you'll see that's not true

    GDP per capita =! GDP per capita PPP

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    You're confusing nominal us dollars and adjusting for price and inflation, or what the OECD calls Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). This is what the article uses and is more meaningful than nominal gdp per capita.

    Here's another source. Also uses the OECD's PPP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (2 children)

    I can't read the article and I'm going by what you quoted which says:

    Poland’s GDP per capita.

    And I said:

    GDP per capita =! GDP per capita PPP>

    I think you're the one who's confused

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    You need to look at the article. That's not my problem.

    Edit: You edited in GDP per capita =! GDP per capita PPP after I posted my reply. What in the living fuck is wrong with you!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment