Comment on /r/BlueSkySocial: "why can't we have one single social media site with a CEO who isn't weird and bad" (one reply mentions Mastodon). (www.reddit.com)

submitted 4 months ago by Kirk@startrek.website to c/fedibridge@lemmy.dbzer0.com

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 6 points 4 months ago

didn't jack from 37 signals make Twitter then take some tech bros to make bluesky?

i don't see that value given the experience with Twitter and musk. fediversal communication communities seem to be the best suited way forward.

i think our Achilles heel here is lack of solid identity management and mature moderation features. lemmy, mbin, piefed, et al have their approaches...

if you want a singular site governed by non-evil, I'd suggest Counter.social.

[-] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 4 months ago

I wish counter.social would federate. It would make me feel more comfortable recommending them.

[-] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 3 points 4 months ago

I agree but in doing so would likely, inadvertently, undermine jester's security controls.

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago

leaflet.pub? tangled.org? Have you seen this blog post? https://overreacted.io/open-social/

[-] crazycraw@crazypeople.online 2 points 4 months ago

I don't have any technical issue with the At protocol or the apps that utilize it. I do not think bluesky /followers is as portable as it's claimed. I do think it's politics are governed by a select few.