sh.itjust.works Main Community

7730 readers

1 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

191

Does anyone know why we’re defederated from beehaw.org? (i.imgur.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

179 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For instance, r/conservative on Reddit famously bans

That's a moderation issue, not a community voting issue.

The problem is that second part is incredibly broad. It can simply be because somebody didn’t like that you use a certain source, even if it’s completely valid.

I disagree that this is a "problem". Votes are opinions, not objective fact.

There is a very specific zeitgeist/mentality there that must be adhered to, regardless of the quality of what you say. That is not a virtue, that is a problem.

Again, that's primarily a moderation issue, not a community voting issue. The moderators enforcing a zeitgeist is certainly a problem; the community, not nearly so much.

For the community, it's really only a problem if we assume upvotes are "good" and downvotes are "bad". You have thus far completely ignored my point that the 80/20, 50/50, and even the 20/80 comment threads are consistently superior to the 100/0 threads. You need disagreement and conflict to have debate. Without the downvotes, you just have a weakly upvoted comment. With the downvotes, you have an immediate indication of a divisive position, ripe for a lively debate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree that this is a “problem”. Votes are opinions, not objective fact.

So what is the desired end result of a voting system, to promote popular opinions, or to promote interesting opinions? Because as implemented, voting-based SM tends to promote the former, and I think many people prefer the latter.

So to me, it is a problem because it's not meeting the goals that presumably most people have.

With the downvotes, you have an immediate indication of a divisive position, ripe for a lively debate.

Many platforms, like Reddit, hide comments that get too many downvotes. So many people just won't see the interesting, controversial discussion, and I think that's a problem.

We should be sorting based on likeliness of being interesting, not popularity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what is the desired end result of a voting system, to promote popular opinions, or to promote interesting opinions?

The voting system just presents the community opinion on the comment. There are any number of ways to weigh those opinions. The other metrics I would want to see are number of threads, average length of threads, average word count in replies, etc. But raw upvoted and downvote counts go a long way toward finding good content.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It only really works in smaller communities imo, as the community gets larger, it just reflects what's popular, and that's a separate scale from good vs bad, especially once your community has self-selected itself into a common way of thinking.

So the question is, how do we mitigate that self selection? How do we promote diversity? Voting doesn't seem to cut it, and I don't think moderation is the way either (we just need the "right people" argument). So yeah, I'd like to see a lot more experimentation with different ways of sorting comments and posts, because I think promoting diverse content is better long term.