0
submitted 3 years ago by lemmyreader@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago

It's pretty disappointing that Mozilla chose to go with Mastodon. There are already plenty of org-backed mastodon instances. It would have been nice for the supposed primary steward of the web and decentralization to really show the power of the fediverse and use a different implementation. Mozilla, and any other orgs starting up instances, could really help expand the fediverse, instead they're helping to cement mastodon in it's Gmail position.

[-] fit6529@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

I think doing something more decentralized than twitter is better than doing nothing at all.

I often hear this argument: you should've done "this" instead of "that". I think it's misleading. Doing "this" is already good. Doing "that" may be good too. Why not do "this" and "that", not only one of them. Resources are not limited: there can be a lot more developers making new products.

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2022
0 points (NaN% liked)

Fediverse

24392 readers
4 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS