▲ 1583 ▼ 5 tomatoes (lemmy.world) submitted 11 months ago by ickplant@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 250 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 157 points 11 months ago (10 children) I’m always disappointed that megameter isn't a common word. People will say “one thousand kilometers” instead of just “one megameter”. permalink fedilink source hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Tyr_Raidho_Othala@reddthat.com 66 points 11 months ago (1 child) Make it a gigameter for my 1000 megameter needs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago The only bad thing about metric is that billionaires technically do have giga dollars. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@quokk.au 45 points 11 months ago (1 child) I'm a fan of light nanosecond, which works out to roughly 30 cm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 28 points 11 months ago (1 child) Infinitely cooler than a "foot" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 child) Which is also approximately 30 cm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 12 points 11 months ago Exactly, but those foot fetishists with their stinky units seem to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent [–] exu@feditown.com 28 points 11 months ago (2 children) Is kibimeter a technically allowed measurement? That would be fun! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago Can anyone say it isn't? You're using a valid prefix, so people will understand what you're saying, if they have no idea in hell why you're measuring out 1024 meters. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 child) Yes, the same way that kiloinches is technically allowed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago Engineers use milliinches all the time! They call it thous but it's the same thing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago How about kilo-klick? permalink fedilink source parent [–] warm@kbin.earth 9 points 11 months ago (3 children) I'm more disappointed the world renamed one thousand million from milliard to billion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] chellomere@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago (3 children) "the world"? If you came over to the other side of the pond, you'd find that most of Europe is still using milliard, billiard, trilliard etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago Anglocentrism strikes again! permalink fedilink source parent [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) I think that's one thing that's actually fine about the English language though. Constantly switching between something ending with "ion" to "iard" instead of just counting up doesn't make much sense to me personally. Million (1A), Milliard (1B), Billion (2A), Billiard (2B) seems odd compared to Million (1), Billion (2), Trillion (3), Quadrillion (4) I suppose the upside is that you don't have to learn as many prefixes, but it'll take another few years of inflation and wealth centralization (at least with currencies like the Euro, Dollar, or Pound) until Quadrillion is relevant in the financial sector and Mathematicians generally use letters. I suppose it makes other natural sciences a tiny bit easier, but there it's usually written in scientific notation anyways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hoimo@ani.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) The million-milliard system means a billion has double the zeroes compared to million, trillion has triple the zeroes, etc. In the English system, a quadrillion has 15 zeroes, so 4 times 3 plus 3? A quadrillion should have 4*6=24 zeroes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) I must admit I still don't see the point. Whether it's double/triple/quadruple of a million or just 3*n+1 doesn't seem to matter much. Of course it'd be better if a "thousand" was just called a "million" then, since that'd remove the +1, but the million milliard system doesn't seem to have any notable advantages otherwise, especially considering every "iard" step is a .5 one, which isn't much cleaner. 1,000 -> 3x0+1 zeroes 1,000,000 -> 3x1+1 zeroes 1,000,000,000 -> 3x2+1 zeroes vs 1,000,000 -> 1x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000 -> 1.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000 -> 2x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000,000,000 -> 2.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 -> 3x6 zeroes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago In the long system: Million - 1 000 000¹ Billion - 1 000 000² Trillion - 1 000 000³ Short system: Million - 1 000² Billion - 1 000³ Trillion - 1 000⁴ It just doesn't follow as smoothly with the increase in power permalink fedilink source parent [–] warm@kbin.earth 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Crazy assumption. While the word is still in use in some languages, the short system has mostly replaced the long system for numbering, especially in the English speaking world. https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/milliard#Translations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chellomere@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago Crazy assumption. Yes, it's true for the English speaking world, but it's much more nuanced outside of it. Here's a map from Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#/media/File:EScalas_corta_y_larga.svg Keep in mind that your link to wiktionary only covers languages where it is spelled exactly "milliard". permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children) When translating to Finnish it's confusing sometimes: Billion = miljardi = 1 000 000 000 Trillion = biljoona = 1 000 000 000 000 Quintillion = triljoona = 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 You can tell how bad a news site is when they translate billion to biljoona and thus making the amount 1000 times higher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (2 children) You probably want double new lines in your posts. Or two spaces at the end of your paragraphs but that's usually a bit annoying to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Or just \ at the end, like so Texty text text \ Text Becomes Like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child) So you escape the newline and you get a newline? That's some black magic voodoo. But hey if it works. Much simpler to handle than double space since you can see them and your phone doesn't try to make them into period space instead of space space. Newlines with double space (or space backslash apparently) also let's you have newlines in a quote block without exiting the block. I see a lot of people struggle with that on Lemmy. E.g. > A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline will render as: A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline So you want to do > A quote with multiple lines \ Will eat the the newline \ Or exit if you don't handle the newline A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline Or add space space at the end instead of space backslash. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) The inventors of Markdown thought they would do something devastatingly clever and eat newlines if the next line has content. That way, if you're writing Markdown in the Stone Age and your editor doesn't support soft-wrap (it's a stone tablet), you can do your own soft-wrap and Markdown will "helpfully" eat all the newlines (unless there are two or more). Of course this has done nothing to help and instead caused chaos and confusion for anyone non-technical. Very clever permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago It would be more useful if there were comments in markdown. Like, it's helpful when organising your writing and thoughts in LaTeX that you can write one line per sentence, double newline for end of paragraph. It becomes immediately clear when a sentence is too long and comments for collaborators (or yourself) are easier to handle than in something like Word or Google Docs. It's also simpler to move sentences around which is important for good writing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago Thanks! Forgot to do that. Now edited. permalink fedilink source parent [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago The long system with milliard and billiard increases with every potens which makes sense. The short system on the other hand 🤷 permalink fedilink source parent [–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 point 11 months ago You can tell how bad a news site is when they translate billion to biljoona and thus making the amount 1000 times higher. Looks like we have something in common! Hämmästyttävä! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 5 points 11 months ago I think that's just not being used to it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rothe@piefed.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Again, anglocentrism strikes. Your feeling is strictly based on your personal experience with your own words. It is like when Americans claim fahrenheit is more for humans than celsius, because they are unable to fathom things they have no experience with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [–] Johanno@feddit.org 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) Megameter gigameter, Next thing is one astronomical unit. And then we are using light years. Not very linear those last two. And I am sure that gigameters would still be better than light years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) well neither astronomical unit nor light years use meters as a reference. and one of those isnt even accurate (AU) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* I think AUs are just meant to mean "far away (like much much further away than the pub)". permalink fedilink source parent [–] boboliosisjones@feddit.nu 8 points 11 months ago (2 children) In Scandinavia we have "mil" which everyone uses, 1 mil, or Scandinavian mile as it is known in English, is 10km. Cuts down ln zeroes. I love this but no one else(outside of Scandinavia) uses it.I typically get a lot of pushback mentioning it to my international peers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sweden and Norway only. Few people in Denmark know what a mil is. And virtually no one here uses it. Yeah-yeah; something something Denmark. I know.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boboliosisjones@feddit.nu 1 point 11 months ago It's never too late to change the path you are going down, friend. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) but there is already decameter edit: nevermind i didnt see the "k" after the 10 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Decameter is 10 meter, not 10 kilometer. 10km would be a myriadmeter. (SI prefix names are based on greek, and myriad is the greek-based name for 10 000). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* i did correct myself like 3 minutes after posting but according to wikipedia there is no prefix for 10 000 in the SI system. only for 1 000 and 1 000 000 permalink fedilink source parent [–] python@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (7 children) People will say “one thousand kilometers” Will they though? I don't talk about distances that large anywhere near often enough to really need a shorthand for it, personally. Had to even look up what things are approximately 1000km apart to even know what to imagine it as (it's about the distance between Paris and Berlin). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago Yes, every time I’ve ever heard someone use metric to describe distances of >999km, they keep using kilometers. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago Comes up a literal metric ass load (8 bushels) when your talking about travel in the USA. We big permalink fedilink source parent [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sweden is quite long, so talking about traveling>1 000 km is not uncommon, but here we have mil, which is equal to 10 km. So on my vacation I traveled 120 mil is more useful and common permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 point 11 months ago Oh no, over here a mil is 1/1000 of an inch, haha permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (4 replies) [–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 points 11 months ago Especially with several thousand kilometres. “Eleven mega metre” rolls off the tongue much better than “eleven thousands kilo metre” IMO. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago I'll never forgive the French for going from grave to gram to kg as the base unit of mass. All my other base units don't have a prefix :( Such a pity. BRING BACK THE GRAVE permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tyr_Raidho_Othala@reddthat.com 66 points 11 months ago (1 child) Make it a gigameter for my 1000 megameter needs permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago The only bad thing about metric is that billionaires technically do have giga dollars. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago The only bad thing about metric is that billionaires technically do have giga dollars. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@quokk.au 45 points 11 months ago (1 child) I'm a fan of light nanosecond, which works out to roughly 30 cm. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 28 points 11 months ago (1 child) Infinitely cooler than a "foot" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 child) Which is also approximately 30 cm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 12 points 11 months ago Exactly, but those foot fetishists with their stinky units seem to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] markz@suppo.fi 28 points 11 months ago (1 child) Infinitely cooler than a "foot" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 child) Which is also approximately 30 cm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 12 points 11 months ago Exactly, but those foot fetishists with their stinky units seem to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 child) Which is also approximately 30 cm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 12 points 11 months ago Exactly, but those foot fetishists with their stinky units seem to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] markz@suppo.fi 12 points 11 months ago Exactly, but those foot fetishists with their stinky units seem to think otherwise. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exu@feditown.com 28 points 11 months ago (2 children) Is kibimeter a technically allowed measurement? That would be fun! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago Can anyone say it isn't? You're using a valid prefix, so people will understand what you're saying, if they have no idea in hell why you're measuring out 1024 meters. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 child) Yes, the same way that kiloinches is technically allowed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago Engineers use milliinches all the time! They call it thous but it's the same thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago Can anyone say it isn't? You're using a valid prefix, so people will understand what you're saying, if they have no idea in hell why you're measuring out 1024 meters. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 child) Yes, the same way that kiloinches is technically allowed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago Engineers use milliinches all the time! They call it thous but it's the same thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago Engineers use milliinches all the time! They call it thous but it's the same thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago How about kilo-klick? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] warm@kbin.earth 9 points 11 months ago (3 children) I'm more disappointed the world renamed one thousand million from milliard to billion. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] chellomere@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago (3 children) "the world"? If you came over to the other side of the pond, you'd find that most of Europe is still using milliard, billiard, trilliard etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago Anglocentrism strikes again! permalink fedilink source parent [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) I think that's one thing that's actually fine about the English language though. Constantly switching between something ending with "ion" to "iard" instead of just counting up doesn't make much sense to me personally. Million (1A), Milliard (1B), Billion (2A), Billiard (2B) seems odd compared to Million (1), Billion (2), Trillion (3), Quadrillion (4) I suppose the upside is that you don't have to learn as many prefixes, but it'll take another few years of inflation and wealth centralization (at least with currencies like the Euro, Dollar, or Pound) until Quadrillion is relevant in the financial sector and Mathematicians generally use letters. I suppose it makes other natural sciences a tiny bit easier, but there it's usually written in scientific notation anyways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hoimo@ani.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) The million-milliard system means a billion has double the zeroes compared to million, trillion has triple the zeroes, etc. In the English system, a quadrillion has 15 zeroes, so 4 times 3 plus 3? A quadrillion should have 4*6=24 zeroes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) I must admit I still don't see the point. Whether it's double/triple/quadruple of a million or just 3*n+1 doesn't seem to matter much. Of course it'd be better if a "thousand" was just called a "million" then, since that'd remove the +1, but the million milliard system doesn't seem to have any notable advantages otherwise, especially considering every "iard" step is a .5 one, which isn't much cleaner. 1,000 -> 3x0+1 zeroes 1,000,000 -> 3x1+1 zeroes 1,000,000,000 -> 3x2+1 zeroes vs 1,000,000 -> 1x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000 -> 1.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000 -> 2x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000,000,000 -> 2.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 -> 3x6 zeroes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago In the long system: Million - 1 000 000¹ Billion - 1 000 000² Trillion - 1 000 000³ Short system: Million - 1 000² Billion - 1 000³ Trillion - 1 000⁴ It just doesn't follow as smoothly with the increase in power permalink fedilink source parent [–] warm@kbin.earth 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Crazy assumption. While the word is still in use in some languages, the short system has mostly replaced the long system for numbering, especially in the English speaking world. https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/milliard#Translations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chellomere@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago Crazy assumption. Yes, it's true for the English speaking world, but it's much more nuanced outside of it. Here's a map from Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#/media/File:EScalas_corta_y_larga.svg Keep in mind that your link to wiktionary only covers languages where it is spelled exactly "milliard". permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children) When translating to Finnish it's confusing sometimes: Billion = miljardi = 1 000 000 000 Trillion = biljoona = 1 000 000 000 000 Quintillion = triljoona = 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 You can tell how bad a news site is when they translate billion to biljoona and thus making the amount 1000 times higher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (2 children) You probably want double new lines in your posts. Or two spaces at the end of your paragraphs but that's usually a bit annoying to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Or just \ at the end, like so Texty text text \ Text Becomes Like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child) So you escape the newline and you get a newline? That's some black magic voodoo. But hey if it works. Much simpler to handle than double space since you can see them and your phone doesn't try to make them into period space instead of space space. Newlines with double space (or space backslash apparently) also let's you have newlines in a quote block without exiting the block. I see a lot of people struggle with that on Lemmy. E.g. > A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline will render as: A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline So you want to do > A quote with multiple lines \ Will eat the the newline \ Or exit if you don't handle the newline A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline Or add space space at the end instead of space backslash. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) The inventors of Markdown thought they would do something devastatingly clever and eat newlines if the next line has content. That way, if you're writing Markdown in the Stone Age and your editor doesn't support soft-wrap (it's a stone tablet), you can do your own soft-wrap and Markdown will "helpfully" eat all the newlines (unless there are two or more). Of course this has done nothing to help and instead caused chaos and confusion for anyone non-technical. Very clever permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago It would be more useful if there were comments in markdown. Like, it's helpful when organising your writing and thoughts in LaTeX that you can write one line per sentence, double newline for end of paragraph. It becomes immediately clear when a sentence is too long and comments for collaborators (or yourself) are easier to handle than in something like Word or Google Docs. It's also simpler to move sentences around which is important for good writing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago Thanks! Forgot to do that. Now edited. permalink fedilink source parent [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago The long system with milliard and billiard increases with every potens which makes sense. The short system on the other hand 🤷 permalink fedilink source parent [–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 point 11 months ago You can tell how bad a news site is when they translate billion to biljoona and thus making the amount 1000 times higher. Looks like we have something in common! Hämmästyttävä! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 5 points 11 months ago I think that's just not being used to it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rothe@piefed.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Again, anglocentrism strikes. Your feeling is strictly based on your personal experience with your own words. It is like when Americans claim fahrenheit is more for humans than celsius, because they are unable to fathom things they have no experience with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago (3 children) "the world"? If you came over to the other side of the pond, you'd find that most of Europe is still using milliard, billiard, trilliard etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago Anglocentrism strikes again! permalink fedilink source parent [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) I think that's one thing that's actually fine about the English language though. Constantly switching between something ending with "ion" to "iard" instead of just counting up doesn't make much sense to me personally. Million (1A), Milliard (1B), Billion (2A), Billiard (2B) seems odd compared to Million (1), Billion (2), Trillion (3), Quadrillion (4) I suppose the upside is that you don't have to learn as many prefixes, but it'll take another few years of inflation and wealth centralization (at least with currencies like the Euro, Dollar, or Pound) until Quadrillion is relevant in the financial sector and Mathematicians generally use letters. I suppose it makes other natural sciences a tiny bit easier, but there it's usually written in scientific notation anyways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hoimo@ani.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) The million-milliard system means a billion has double the zeroes compared to million, trillion has triple the zeroes, etc. In the English system, a quadrillion has 15 zeroes, so 4 times 3 plus 3? A quadrillion should have 4*6=24 zeroes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) I must admit I still don't see the point. Whether it's double/triple/quadruple of a million or just 3*n+1 doesn't seem to matter much. Of course it'd be better if a "thousand" was just called a "million" then, since that'd remove the +1, but the million milliard system doesn't seem to have any notable advantages otherwise, especially considering every "iard" step is a .5 one, which isn't much cleaner. 1,000 -> 3x0+1 zeroes 1,000,000 -> 3x1+1 zeroes 1,000,000,000 -> 3x2+1 zeroes vs 1,000,000 -> 1x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000 -> 1.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000 -> 2x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000,000,000 -> 2.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 -> 3x6 zeroes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago In the long system: Million - 1 000 000¹ Billion - 1 000 000² Trillion - 1 000 000³ Short system: Million - 1 000² Billion - 1 000³ Trillion - 1 000⁴ It just doesn't follow as smoothly with the increase in power permalink fedilink source parent [–] warm@kbin.earth 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Crazy assumption. While the word is still in use in some languages, the short system has mostly replaced the long system for numbering, especially in the English speaking world. https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/milliard#Translations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chellomere@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago Crazy assumption. Yes, it's true for the English speaking world, but it's much more nuanced outside of it. Here's a map from Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#/media/File:EScalas_corta_y_larga.svg Keep in mind that your link to wiktionary only covers languages where it is spelled exactly "milliard". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago Anglocentrism strikes again! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) I think that's one thing that's actually fine about the English language though. Constantly switching between something ending with "ion" to "iard" instead of just counting up doesn't make much sense to me personally. Million (1A), Milliard (1B), Billion (2A), Billiard (2B) seems odd compared to Million (1), Billion (2), Trillion (3), Quadrillion (4) I suppose the upside is that you don't have to learn as many prefixes, but it'll take another few years of inflation and wealth centralization (at least with currencies like the Euro, Dollar, or Pound) until Quadrillion is relevant in the financial sector and Mathematicians generally use letters. I suppose it makes other natural sciences a tiny bit easier, but there it's usually written in scientific notation anyways. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Hoimo@ani.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) The million-milliard system means a billion has double the zeroes compared to million, trillion has triple the zeroes, etc. In the English system, a quadrillion has 15 zeroes, so 4 times 3 plus 3? A quadrillion should have 4*6=24 zeroes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) I must admit I still don't see the point. Whether it's double/triple/quadruple of a million or just 3*n+1 doesn't seem to matter much. Of course it'd be better if a "thousand" was just called a "million" then, since that'd remove the +1, but the million milliard system doesn't seem to have any notable advantages otherwise, especially considering every "iard" step is a .5 one, which isn't much cleaner. 1,000 -> 3x0+1 zeroes 1,000,000 -> 3x1+1 zeroes 1,000,000,000 -> 3x2+1 zeroes vs 1,000,000 -> 1x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000 -> 1.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000 -> 2x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000,000,000 -> 2.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 -> 3x6 zeroes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago In the long system: Million - 1 000 000¹ Billion - 1 000 000² Trillion - 1 000 000³ Short system: Million - 1 000² Billion - 1 000³ Trillion - 1 000⁴ It just doesn't follow as smoothly with the increase in power permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hoimo@ani.social 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) The million-milliard system means a billion has double the zeroes compared to million, trillion has triple the zeroes, etc. In the English system, a quadrillion has 15 zeroes, so 4 times 3 plus 3? A quadrillion should have 4*6=24 zeroes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) I must admit I still don't see the point. Whether it's double/triple/quadruple of a million or just 3*n+1 doesn't seem to matter much. Of course it'd be better if a "thousand" was just called a "million" then, since that'd remove the +1, but the million milliard system doesn't seem to have any notable advantages otherwise, especially considering every "iard" step is a .5 one, which isn't much cleaner. 1,000 -> 3x0+1 zeroes 1,000,000 -> 3x1+1 zeroes 1,000,000,000 -> 3x2+1 zeroes vs 1,000,000 -> 1x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000 -> 1.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000 -> 2x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000,000,000 -> 2.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 -> 3x6 zeroes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago In the long system: Million - 1 000 000¹ Billion - 1 000 000² Trillion - 1 000 000³ Short system: Million - 1 000² Billion - 1 000³ Trillion - 1 000⁴ It just doesn't follow as smoothly with the increase in power permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) I must admit I still don't see the point. Whether it's double/triple/quadruple of a million or just 3*n+1 doesn't seem to matter much. Of course it'd be better if a "thousand" was just called a "million" then, since that'd remove the +1, but the million milliard system doesn't seem to have any notable advantages otherwise, especially considering every "iard" step is a .5 one, which isn't much cleaner. 1,000 -> 3x0+1 zeroes 1,000,000 -> 3x1+1 zeroes 1,000,000,000 -> 3x2+1 zeroes vs 1,000,000 -> 1x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000 -> 1.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000 -> 2x6 zeroes (1,000,000,000,000,000 -> 2.5x6 zeroes) 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 -> 3x6 zeroes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago In the long system: Million - 1 000 000¹ Billion - 1 000 000² Trillion - 1 000 000³ Short system: Million - 1 000² Billion - 1 000³ Trillion - 1 000⁴ It just doesn't follow as smoothly with the increase in power permalink fedilink source parent
[–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago In the long system: Million - 1 000 000¹ Billion - 1 000 000² Trillion - 1 000 000³ Short system: Million - 1 000² Billion - 1 000³ Trillion - 1 000⁴ It just doesn't follow as smoothly with the increase in power permalink fedilink source parent
[–] warm@kbin.earth 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) Crazy assumption. While the word is still in use in some languages, the short system has mostly replaced the long system for numbering, especially in the English speaking world. https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/milliard#Translations permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chellomere@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago Crazy assumption. Yes, it's true for the English speaking world, but it's much more nuanced outside of it. Here's a map from Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#/media/File:EScalas_corta_y_larga.svg Keep in mind that your link to wiktionary only covers languages where it is spelled exactly "milliard". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago Crazy assumption. Yes, it's true for the English speaking world, but it's much more nuanced outside of it. Here's a map from Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales#/media/File:EScalas_corta_y_larga.svg Keep in mind that your link to wiktionary only covers languages where it is spelled exactly "milliard". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children) When translating to Finnish it's confusing sometimes: Billion = miljardi = 1 000 000 000 Trillion = biljoona = 1 000 000 000 000 Quintillion = triljoona = 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 You can tell how bad a news site is when they translate billion to biljoona and thus making the amount 1000 times higher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (2 children) You probably want double new lines in your posts. Or two spaces at the end of your paragraphs but that's usually a bit annoying to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Or just \ at the end, like so Texty text text \ Text Becomes Like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child) So you escape the newline and you get a newline? That's some black magic voodoo. But hey if it works. Much simpler to handle than double space since you can see them and your phone doesn't try to make them into period space instead of space space. Newlines with double space (or space backslash apparently) also let's you have newlines in a quote block without exiting the block. I see a lot of people struggle with that on Lemmy. E.g. > A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline will render as: A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline So you want to do > A quote with multiple lines \ Will eat the the newline \ Or exit if you don't handle the newline A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline Or add space space at the end instead of space backslash. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) The inventors of Markdown thought they would do something devastatingly clever and eat newlines if the next line has content. That way, if you're writing Markdown in the Stone Age and your editor doesn't support soft-wrap (it's a stone tablet), you can do your own soft-wrap and Markdown will "helpfully" eat all the newlines (unless there are two or more). Of course this has done nothing to help and instead caused chaos and confusion for anyone non-technical. Very clever permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago It would be more useful if there were comments in markdown. Like, it's helpful when organising your writing and thoughts in LaTeX that you can write one line per sentence, double newline for end of paragraph. It becomes immediately clear when a sentence is too long and comments for collaborators (or yourself) are easier to handle than in something like Word or Google Docs. It's also simpler to move sentences around which is important for good writing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago Thanks! Forgot to do that. Now edited. permalink fedilink source parent [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago The long system with milliard and billiard increases with every potens which makes sense. The short system on the other hand 🤷 permalink fedilink source parent [–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 point 11 months ago You can tell how bad a news site is when they translate billion to biljoona and thus making the amount 1000 times higher. Looks like we have something in common! Hämmästyttävä! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago (2 children) You probably want double new lines in your posts. Or two spaces at the end of your paragraphs but that's usually a bit annoying to do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Or just \ at the end, like so Texty text text \ Text Becomes Like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child) So you escape the newline and you get a newline? That's some black magic voodoo. But hey if it works. Much simpler to handle than double space since you can see them and your phone doesn't try to make them into period space instead of space space. Newlines with double space (or space backslash apparently) also let's you have newlines in a quote block without exiting the block. I see a lot of people struggle with that on Lemmy. E.g. > A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline will render as: A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline So you want to do > A quote with multiple lines \ Will eat the the newline \ Or exit if you don't handle the newline A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline Or add space space at the end instead of space backslash. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) The inventors of Markdown thought they would do something devastatingly clever and eat newlines if the next line has content. That way, if you're writing Markdown in the Stone Age and your editor doesn't support soft-wrap (it's a stone tablet), you can do your own soft-wrap and Markdown will "helpfully" eat all the newlines (unless there are two or more). Of course this has done nothing to help and instead caused chaos and confusion for anyone non-technical. Very clever permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago It would be more useful if there were comments in markdown. Like, it's helpful when organising your writing and thoughts in LaTeX that you can write one line per sentence, double newline for end of paragraph. It becomes immediately clear when a sentence is too long and comments for collaborators (or yourself) are easier to handle than in something like Word or Google Docs. It's also simpler to move sentences around which is important for good writing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago Thanks! Forgot to do that. Now edited. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) Or just \ at the end, like so Texty text text \ Text Becomes Like this permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child) So you escape the newline and you get a newline? That's some black magic voodoo. But hey if it works. Much simpler to handle than double space since you can see them and your phone doesn't try to make them into period space instead of space space. Newlines with double space (or space backslash apparently) also let's you have newlines in a quote block without exiting the block. I see a lot of people struggle with that on Lemmy. E.g. > A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline will render as: A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline So you want to do > A quote with multiple lines \ Will eat the the newline \ Or exit if you don't handle the newline A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline Or add space space at the end instead of space backslash. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) The inventors of Markdown thought they would do something devastatingly clever and eat newlines if the next line has content. That way, if you're writing Markdown in the Stone Age and your editor doesn't support soft-wrap (it's a stone tablet), you can do your own soft-wrap and Markdown will "helpfully" eat all the newlines (unless there are two or more). Of course this has done nothing to help and instead caused chaos and confusion for anyone non-technical. Very clever permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago It would be more useful if there were comments in markdown. Like, it's helpful when organising your writing and thoughts in LaTeX that you can write one line per sentence, double newline for end of paragraph. It becomes immediately clear when a sentence is too long and comments for collaborators (or yourself) are easier to handle than in something like Word or Google Docs. It's also simpler to move sentences around which is important for good writing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (1 child) So you escape the newline and you get a newline? That's some black magic voodoo. But hey if it works. Much simpler to handle than double space since you can see them and your phone doesn't try to make them into period space instead of space space. Newlines with double space (or space backslash apparently) also let's you have newlines in a quote block without exiting the block. I see a lot of people struggle with that on Lemmy. E.g. > A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline will render as: A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline So you want to do > A quote with multiple lines \ Will eat the the newline \ Or exit if you don't handle the newline A quote with multiple lines Will eat the the newline Or exit if you don't handle the newline Or add space space at the end instead of space backslash. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) The inventors of Markdown thought they would do something devastatingly clever and eat newlines if the next line has content. That way, if you're writing Markdown in the Stone Age and your editor doesn't support soft-wrap (it's a stone tablet), you can do your own soft-wrap and Markdown will "helpfully" eat all the newlines (unless there are two or more). Of course this has done nothing to help and instead caused chaos and confusion for anyone non-technical. Very clever permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago It would be more useful if there were comments in markdown. Like, it's helpful when organising your writing and thoughts in LaTeX that you can write one line per sentence, double newline for end of paragraph. It becomes immediately clear when a sentence is too long and comments for collaborators (or yourself) are easier to handle than in something like Word or Google Docs. It's also simpler to move sentences around which is important for good writing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) The inventors of Markdown thought they would do something devastatingly clever and eat newlines if the next line has content. That way, if you're writing Markdown in the Stone Age and your editor doesn't support soft-wrap (it's a stone tablet), you can do your own soft-wrap and Markdown will "helpfully" eat all the newlines (unless there are two or more). Of course this has done nothing to help and instead caused chaos and confusion for anyone non-technical. Very clever permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago It would be more useful if there were comments in markdown. Like, it's helpful when organising your writing and thoughts in LaTeX that you can write one line per sentence, double newline for end of paragraph. It becomes immediately clear when a sentence is too long and comments for collaborators (or yourself) are easier to handle than in something like Word or Google Docs. It's also simpler to move sentences around which is important for good writing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago It would be more useful if there were comments in markdown. Like, it's helpful when organising your writing and thoughts in LaTeX that you can write one line per sentence, double newline for end of paragraph. It becomes immediately clear when a sentence is too long and comments for collaborators (or yourself) are easier to handle than in something like Word or Google Docs. It's also simpler to move sentences around which is important for good writing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TeNppa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago Thanks! Forgot to do that. Now edited. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago The long system with milliard and billiard increases with every potens which makes sense. The short system on the other hand 🤷 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 point 11 months ago You can tell how bad a news site is when they translate billion to biljoona and thus making the amount 1000 times higher. Looks like we have something in common! Hämmästyttävä! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 5 points 11 months ago I think that's just not being used to it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rothe@piefed.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Again, anglocentrism strikes. Your feeling is strictly based on your personal experience with your own words. It is like when Americans claim fahrenheit is more for humans than celsius, because they are unable to fathom things they have no experience with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 5 points 11 months ago I think that's just not being used to it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Again, anglocentrism strikes. Your feeling is strictly based on your personal experience with your own words. It is like when Americans claim fahrenheit is more for humans than celsius, because they are unable to fathom things they have no experience with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[–] Johanno@feddit.org 9 points 11 months ago (1 child) Megameter gigameter, Next thing is one astronomical unit. And then we are using light years. Not very linear those last two. And I am sure that gigameters would still be better than light years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) well neither astronomical unit nor light years use meters as a reference. and one of those isnt even accurate (AU) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* I think AUs are just meant to mean "far away (like much much further away than the pub)". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 point 11 months ago (1 child) well neither astronomical unit nor light years use meters as a reference. and one of those isnt even accurate (AU) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* I think AUs are just meant to mean "far away (like much much further away than the pub)". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* I think AUs are just meant to mean "far away (like much much further away than the pub)". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boboliosisjones@feddit.nu 8 points 11 months ago (2 children) In Scandinavia we have "mil" which everyone uses, 1 mil, or Scandinavian mile as it is known in English, is 10km. Cuts down ln zeroes. I love this but no one else(outside of Scandinavia) uses it.I typically get a lot of pushback mentioning it to my international peers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sweden and Norway only. Few people in Denmark know what a mil is. And virtually no one here uses it. Yeah-yeah; something something Denmark. I know.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boboliosisjones@feddit.nu 1 point 11 months ago It's never too late to change the path you are going down, friend. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) but there is already decameter edit: nevermind i didnt see the "k" after the 10 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Decameter is 10 meter, not 10 kilometer. 10km would be a myriadmeter. (SI prefix names are based on greek, and myriad is the greek-based name for 10 000). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* i did correct myself like 3 minutes after posting but according to wikipedia there is no prefix for 10 000 in the SI system. only for 1 000 and 1 000 000 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sweden and Norway only. Few people in Denmark know what a mil is. And virtually no one here uses it. Yeah-yeah; something something Denmark. I know.... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boboliosisjones@feddit.nu 1 point 11 months ago It's never too late to change the path you are going down, friend. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boboliosisjones@feddit.nu 1 point 11 months ago It's never too late to change the path you are going down, friend. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) but there is already decameter edit: nevermind i didnt see the "k" after the 10 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Decameter is 10 meter, not 10 kilometer. 10km would be a myriadmeter. (SI prefix names are based on greek, and myriad is the greek-based name for 10 000). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* i did correct myself like 3 minutes after posting but according to wikipedia there is no prefix for 10 000 in the SI system. only for 1 000 and 1 000 000 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 child) Decameter is 10 meter, not 10 kilometer. 10km would be a myriadmeter. (SI prefix names are based on greek, and myriad is the greek-based name for 10 000). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* i did correct myself like 3 minutes after posting but according to wikipedia there is no prefix for 10 000 in the SI system. only for 1 000 and 1 000 000 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago* i did correct myself like 3 minutes after posting but according to wikipedia there is no prefix for 10 000 in the SI system. only for 1 000 and 1 000 000 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] python@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (7 children) People will say “one thousand kilometers” Will they though? I don't talk about distances that large anywhere near often enough to really need a shorthand for it, personally. Had to even look up what things are approximately 1000km apart to even know what to imagine it as (it's about the distance between Paris and Berlin). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago Yes, every time I’ve ever heard someone use metric to describe distances of >999km, they keep using kilometers. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago Comes up a literal metric ass load (8 bushels) when your talking about travel in the USA. We big permalink fedilink source parent [–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sweden is quite long, so talking about traveling>1 000 km is not uncommon, but here we have mil, which is equal to 10 km. So on my vacation I traveled 120 mil is more useful and common permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 point 11 months ago Oh no, over here a mil is 1/1000 of an inch, haha permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago Yes, every time I’ve ever heard someone use metric to describe distances of >999km, they keep using kilometers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago Comes up a literal metric ass load (8 bushels) when your talking about travel in the USA. We big permalink fedilink source parent
[–] guy@piefed.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 child) Sweden is quite long, so talking about traveling>1 000 km is not uncommon, but here we have mil, which is equal to 10 km. So on my vacation I traveled 120 mil is more useful and common permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 point 11 months ago Oh no, over here a mil is 1/1000 of an inch, haha permalink fedilink source parent
[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 point 11 months ago Oh no, over here a mil is 1/1000 of an inch, haha permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 points 11 months ago Especially with several thousand kilometres. “Eleven mega metre” rolls off the tongue much better than “eleven thousands kilo metre” IMO. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago I'll never forgive the French for going from grave to gram to kg as the base unit of mass. All my other base units don't have a prefix :( Such a pity. BRING BACK THE GRAVE permalink fedilink source parent