Extremely disappointing to see this, this is not a Sankara thing to do at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 1 year ago* (20 children)

Who are they trying to please with this ? What's the lawmaking process? I was under the impression the government currently mostly does whatever it wants so I'm trying to understand what actual purpose this even has. Are there groups they need to court the opinion of internally? Are they doing this because they're aiming to appeal to groups externally elsewhere in Africa as part of expanding AES?

I'd just like some insight into what forces or pressures brought this about at a time when surely their biggest priority should be territorial control of their whole borders which are being fought over with the extreme islamic groups. Maybe that's it? Maybe it cuts into one of the motivations those people have for fighting for them? I don't know, speculating.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago

    I have very limited knowledge but the explanation I got was the military is not secular enough and the average soldier is influenced by either old Catholic homophobia or newer Salafist homophobia, and the latter is used as a recruitment technique to pull soldiers to the Salafist militias who are the biggest threat to the current governments. The theory apparently is that making 'deviant' sexual behaviour illegal on paper means the propaganda cudgel is taken away from the militias but thje government never has to enforce it meaningfully when they decide to be allies- that last part seemed like cope on the person I was talking to's part

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (15 children)
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

    what are you on about?

    for starters, which countries are "foreign"?

    obviously 99% of web users are going to be from a different country to you, and therefore not share your country's political norms

    secondly, wut?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Awoo's question is based on this line of thinking:

    • Assume the Ouagadougou government isn't homophobic

    • Then they pass a homophobic law

    • Therefore they must be passing the law to play 3D chess

    They passed an anti-gay law coz they're anti-gay. Let's not overthink this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It's not 3D chess to consider whether there's political reasons rather than cultural ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think it's safe to say whatever reasons may exist, they aren't valid ones. I'm highly skeptical the "play" of throwing a bunch of your comrades under the bus like that is ever effective even in the most clinical analysis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    It's always better to understand why these things happen than to dismiss them as 'just homophobia' in a knee jerk reaction. Yes, of course it's homophobia at its core, but as a queer person who has the privilege of watching this as an onlooker rather than living through it in Burkina Faso (and my heart goes out to the people living through it), I would like to understand what conditions surround the implementation of evil laws like this. Exploring that is not legitimising the homophobia.

    And frankly accusing Awoo of trying to do that is just taking what she's saying in bad faith.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    obviously 99% of web users are going to be from a different country to you, and therefore not share your country's political norms

    huh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    I was under the impression the government currently mostly does whatever it wants so I'm trying to understand what actual purpose this even has

    gonna go ahead and assume it's because they're homophobic and they like homophobic policy.

  • source
  • parent