1452
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

People can babble about water proofing, etc. There is no legitimate engineering problem.

Even if it was a legitimate problem, it's sad that only about half of the phones are certified waterproof even if almost all are sealed.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Not that the phones are warrantied against water damage even if they are rated as water resistant.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

"It's easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable" is a common argument; if it's really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

One of the very few phones like this.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1452 points (97.1% liked)

> Greentext

8007 readers
40 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS