view the rest of the comments
the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
Broadly, I agree with this and I can see this point of view. "What does America's evil have to do with it? I thought we were talking about Russia?"
There are several things which widened my perspective on discussions like these, though.
Oftentimes, America's evils have a lot to do with it. With regards to the current Ukraine war, the US and NATO have been ramping up aggression against Russia for years prior to the current invasion. The 2014 Maidan was a far-right initiative closely watched and de facto backed by the US, like in Chile, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Cuba and countless others before. The fighting that this kicked off in the Donbas region has killed more than 10 000 people since then. What I've seen too often is this sort of historical context be waved off as "whataboutism", as though the direct material reasons for the current situation were irrelevant.
The point is often (or at least, it should be) to get people to think more critically about their media. The double standard constantly being applied to other countries is meaningful and worth scrutiny. Our western sources have the inherent privilege of being considered trustworthy and not propaganda, and from those sources we hear about how any foreign or dissident media is propaganda and therefore untrustworthy. This is a dangerous sort of thinking to internalize, because all media is propaganda, including the western sources. The end result - which is what this so-called "whataboutism" is often trying to bring attention to - is predictable: the typical US media consumer will see other countries have their history exaggerated, distorted and outright fabricated while the atrocities of the US are downplayed, quietly mentioned if at all. What we are told about other countries by our supposedly unbiased and reliable media often comes with a massive conflict of interest attached. (Further reading: Manufacturing Consent by Herman and Chomsky, and Inventing Reality by Parenti)