▲ 151 ▼ Hexbear’s entire point in federating was to fuck shit up. (lemmy.ca) submitted 3 years ago by AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net 255 comments fedilink hide all child comments New tagline just dropped.
[–] WhyIsItReal@hexbear.net 76 points 3 years ago (3 children) … that’s not how percentages work lemmygrad seems to be trans-friendly, and hexbear certainly is, but you can’t just add percentages together to get the total percentage permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CriticalResist8@hexbear.net 78 points 3 years ago (5 children) Um if it's not how they work, then how come I just did it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 60 points 3 years ago Math is the thirteenth type of liberalism permalink fedilink source parent [–] RION@hexbear.net 46 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 33 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Two imaginary groups, one with 100 people and one with 1000. The group with 100 has 50 trans people (50%). The group with 1000 people has 500 trans people (also 50%). By your method, they would be 100% trans in total. In reality, the total would be that 550 out of 1100 are trans, again 50%. Second round: one group is 50/100 (50%) trans and the other is 50/1000 (5%) trans. Does that mean they are 55% trans cumulatively? No, they are 9.091% trans. idk the numbers for our instances but I imagine that it's around 25%. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 17 points 3 years ago I like his method more. We can finally complete the gay agenda by adding together groups of 100% trans people until we achieve a 100,000% group, then adding that group to the rest of humanity. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Graphite22@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] FuckYourselfEndless@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago 10% x 40% = 400% trans lemmyverse. Deal with it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Just jumping in to confirm for passersby that Lemmygrad is very much trans-friendly. Cannot help with the math. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CriticalResist8@hexbear.net 78 points 3 years ago (5 children) Um if it's not how they work, then how come I just did it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 60 points 3 years ago Math is the thirteenth type of liberalism permalink fedilink source parent [–] RION@hexbear.net 46 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 33 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Two imaginary groups, one with 100 people and one with 1000. The group with 100 has 50 trans people (50%). The group with 1000 people has 500 trans people (also 50%). By your method, they would be 100% trans in total. In reality, the total would be that 550 out of 1100 are trans, again 50%. Second round: one group is 50/100 (50%) trans and the other is 50/1000 (5%) trans. Does that mean they are 55% trans cumulatively? No, they are 9.091% trans. idk the numbers for our instances but I imagine that it's around 25%. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 17 points 3 years ago I like his method more. We can finally complete the gay agenda by adding together groups of 100% trans people until we achieve a 100,000% group, then adding that group to the rest of humanity. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Graphite22@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 60 points 3 years ago Math is the thirteenth type of liberalism permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 3 years ago (1 child) Two imaginary groups, one with 100 people and one with 1000. The group with 100 has 50 trans people (50%). The group with 1000 people has 500 trans people (also 50%). By your method, they would be 100% trans in total. In reality, the total would be that 550 out of 1100 are trans, again 50%. Second round: one group is 50/100 (50%) trans and the other is 50/1000 (5%) trans. Does that mean they are 55% trans cumulatively? No, they are 9.091% trans. idk the numbers for our instances but I imagine that it's around 25%. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 17 points 3 years ago I like his method more. We can finally complete the gay agenda by adding together groups of 100% trans people until we achieve a 100,000% group, then adding that group to the rest of humanity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 17 points 3 years ago I like his method more. We can finally complete the gay agenda by adding together groups of 100% trans people until we achieve a 100,000% group, then adding that group to the rest of humanity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuckYourselfEndless@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago 10% x 40% = 400% trans lemmyverse. Deal with it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 point 3 years ago Just jumping in to confirm for passersby that Lemmygrad is very much trans-friendly. Cannot help with the math. permalink fedilink source parent