this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

12 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
65
AI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pause (www.hollywoodreporter.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A federal judge on Friday upheld a finding from the U.S. Copyright Office that a piece of art created by AI is not open to protection.

"In March, the copyright office affirmed that most works generated by AI aren’t copyrightable but clarified that AI-assisted materials qualify for protection in certain instances. An application for a work created with the help of AI can support a copyright claim if a human “selected or arranged” it in a “sufficiently creative way that the resulting work constitutes an original work of authorship,” it said."

Thaler was appealing this, and his appeal was denied.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't read the article but does it say anything about detectability? If I claim I created it who can prove an AI did?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn’t read the article but

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So I read the article and the lawsuit has nothing to do with my question. It's more about precedent and actually finding out what the laws are if everything is as claimed.

Still think detectability is an interesting question.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but detectability isn't a new question, is it? It's just a twist on the old question of "Did someone else create it other than the guy who claimed it?"