β² 1007 βΌ ππππ (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] Nyadia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 112 points 1 year ago (1 child) White Christians spreading the love in Uganda: "God wants you to stone homosexuals to death" permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (4 children) Unfortunately Ugandans view lgbt stuff as neo colonialism. Most Africans are rather religious and traditional. If not Christian they are Muslims; both of which are none native to Africa and homophobic. Its hard to see how they will change their minds unless they come to the conclusion on their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (2 children) I wonder if the West having this new wave of anti-queer reaction will short-circuit this cycle. Hard to claim we are agents of neocolonialism and imperialism when the US is attacking trans people and is on the cusp of rolling back gay marriage rights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe, but they view their religion as native, not foreign. And those have built in homophobia in the doctrine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children) Doctrine and religion are always changing based on historical forces, so if the historical winds are blowing against "lgbt=colonialism" then this will have effects on religion and doctrine. The contradiction will need to be resolved somehow. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Contradiction with religious folk is often boiled down to "if I don't believe the contradiction exists then it must not exist!" Source: whenever anyone brings up contradictions in the Bible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* I'm talking about contradictions that can arise between religion and politics. If their religion says to be charitable to the poor, but their politics say to starve the poor, they'll starve the poor. If their religion says to love their neighbor, but their politics tells them to hate their neighbor, they'll hate their neighbor. When there's a contradiction between religion and politics, they'll choose politics and then work backwards from there to justify it religiously. permalink fedilink source parent [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I get what your saying, but I'm adding that even independently of that they follow abrahamic religions and that is homophobic. On one hand there is a niew of neo colonialism and on the other you might be asking them to be more secular. Both are very steep and somewhat independent hills. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Abrahamic religion isn't set in stone, it's capable of reform and has even done so in other historical contexts. This doesn't even require secularism, all it requires is that they read their books in a different way for different interpretations. But secularism isn't impossible. As the colonizers become less secular and more religious, the historical currents begin to push against religion among the colonized. Perhaps less so among Muslims because they can deflect the contradictions onto sectarianism against the Christian colonizers, but African Christians will have to reconcile the contradiction between their anti-colonialism and worshiping the god of religious colonizers. Or they'll convert to Islam. It's hard to say. But there are lots of ways this can play out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Fair enough. Just that coming from a fundie place I think the cognitive backflips might hold. Tho I hope you're right π permalink fedilink source parent [β] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) That'd be... nice... but no. When it come to homophobia, people hate what they don't understand and then come up with reasons to justify it, not the other way around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Misanthropy tbh Hate has a material basis, it's not just something that emerges organically from human nature. The ruling class needs to maximize the reproduction of labor so it invented and promoted queer hate as a way to remove one of those obstacles. Its material basis is actually very similar to anti-abortion and anti-contraception and anti-feminist politics. permalink fedilink source parent [β] burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) Funny that you bring that up. Most of Africa and West Asia got colonized when Victorian England was at its prudest point. They "civilizedβ the "savages" and taught them their Victorian moral values. This has a lasting influence until today. While you consider yourself civilized and educated and those others are the backwards ideas, in reality while your ancestors were living off their wealth they had the capacity to think about luxury like human rights (Iβm sorry, it shouldnβt be a luxury, but it is), while the colonized were busy trying to survive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* while the colonized were busy trying to survive. Still are unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent [β] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Alright, Iβll admit this is a plan for a story Iβm writing to help define who the bad guys are: They hate the neighboring country, and homosexuality. They use puritanical thinking to frame the latter as an evil invention of the former; βThe men there are so fowl and heartless, they hate all forms of femininity, and prefer to bond with other demons like themselves. The women feel forced to find love with each other.β Iβm starting to get curious if any one particular country might feel offended at my story when I someday write it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Doesn't feel like a specific call out. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Korne127@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Viewing accepting and supporting people that are different as (neo-)colonialism is just dumb. They deserve to be seen as equal and live a happy life there as much as anywhere else. Being African doesn't excuse you for being an asshole. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (4 children) Unfortunately Ugandans view lgbt stuff as neo colonialism. Most Africans are rather religious and traditional. If not Christian they are Muslims; both of which are none native to Africa and homophobic. Its hard to see how they will change their minds unless they come to the conclusion on their own. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (2 children) I wonder if the West having this new wave of anti-queer reaction will short-circuit this cycle. Hard to claim we are agents of neocolonialism and imperialism when the US is attacking trans people and is on the cusp of rolling back gay marriage rights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe, but they view their religion as native, not foreign. And those have built in homophobia in the doctrine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children) Doctrine and religion are always changing based on historical forces, so if the historical winds are blowing against "lgbt=colonialism" then this will have effects on religion and doctrine. The contradiction will need to be resolved somehow. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Contradiction with religious folk is often boiled down to "if I don't believe the contradiction exists then it must not exist!" Source: whenever anyone brings up contradictions in the Bible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* I'm talking about contradictions that can arise between religion and politics. If their religion says to be charitable to the poor, but their politics say to starve the poor, they'll starve the poor. If their religion says to love their neighbor, but their politics tells them to hate their neighbor, they'll hate their neighbor. When there's a contradiction between religion and politics, they'll choose politics and then work backwards from there to justify it religiously. permalink fedilink source parent [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I get what your saying, but I'm adding that even independently of that they follow abrahamic religions and that is homophobic. On one hand there is a niew of neo colonialism and on the other you might be asking them to be more secular. Both are very steep and somewhat independent hills. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Abrahamic religion isn't set in stone, it's capable of reform and has even done so in other historical contexts. This doesn't even require secularism, all it requires is that they read their books in a different way for different interpretations. But secularism isn't impossible. As the colonizers become less secular and more religious, the historical currents begin to push against religion among the colonized. Perhaps less so among Muslims because they can deflect the contradictions onto sectarianism against the Christian colonizers, but African Christians will have to reconcile the contradiction between their anti-colonialism and worshiping the god of religious colonizers. Or they'll convert to Islam. It's hard to say. But there are lots of ways this can play out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Fair enough. Just that coming from a fundie place I think the cognitive backflips might hold. Tho I hope you're right π permalink fedilink source parent [β] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) That'd be... nice... but no. When it come to homophobia, people hate what they don't understand and then come up with reasons to justify it, not the other way around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Misanthropy tbh Hate has a material basis, it's not just something that emerges organically from human nature. The ruling class needs to maximize the reproduction of labor so it invented and promoted queer hate as a way to remove one of those obstacles. Its material basis is actually very similar to anti-abortion and anti-contraception and anti-feminist politics. permalink fedilink source parent [β] burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) Funny that you bring that up. Most of Africa and West Asia got colonized when Victorian England was at its prudest point. They "civilizedβ the "savages" and taught them their Victorian moral values. This has a lasting influence until today. While you consider yourself civilized and educated and those others are the backwards ideas, in reality while your ancestors were living off their wealth they had the capacity to think about luxury like human rights (Iβm sorry, it shouldnβt be a luxury, but it is), while the colonized were busy trying to survive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* while the colonized were busy trying to survive. Still are unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent [β] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Alright, Iβll admit this is a plan for a story Iβm writing to help define who the bad guys are: They hate the neighboring country, and homosexuality. They use puritanical thinking to frame the latter as an evil invention of the former; βThe men there are so fowl and heartless, they hate all forms of femininity, and prefer to bond with other demons like themselves. The women feel forced to find love with each other.β Iβm starting to get curious if any one particular country might feel offended at my story when I someday write it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Doesn't feel like a specific call out. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Korne127@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Viewing accepting and supporting people that are different as (neo-)colonialism is just dumb. They deserve to be seen as equal and live a happy life there as much as anywhere else. Being African doesn't excuse you for being an asshole. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (2 children) I wonder if the West having this new wave of anti-queer reaction will short-circuit this cycle. Hard to claim we are agents of neocolonialism and imperialism when the US is attacking trans people and is on the cusp of rolling back gay marriage rights. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe, but they view their religion as native, not foreign. And those have built in homophobia in the doctrine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children) Doctrine and religion are always changing based on historical forces, so if the historical winds are blowing against "lgbt=colonialism" then this will have effects on religion and doctrine. The contradiction will need to be resolved somehow. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Contradiction with religious folk is often boiled down to "if I don't believe the contradiction exists then it must not exist!" Source: whenever anyone brings up contradictions in the Bible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* I'm talking about contradictions that can arise between religion and politics. If their religion says to be charitable to the poor, but their politics say to starve the poor, they'll starve the poor. If their religion says to love their neighbor, but their politics tells them to hate their neighbor, they'll hate their neighbor. When there's a contradiction between religion and politics, they'll choose politics and then work backwards from there to justify it religiously. permalink fedilink source parent [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I get what your saying, but I'm adding that even independently of that they follow abrahamic religions and that is homophobic. On one hand there is a niew of neo colonialism and on the other you might be asking them to be more secular. Both are very steep and somewhat independent hills. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Abrahamic religion isn't set in stone, it's capable of reform and has even done so in other historical contexts. This doesn't even require secularism, all it requires is that they read their books in a different way for different interpretations. But secularism isn't impossible. As the colonizers become less secular and more religious, the historical currents begin to push against religion among the colonized. Perhaps less so among Muslims because they can deflect the contradictions onto sectarianism against the Christian colonizers, but African Christians will have to reconcile the contradiction between their anti-colonialism and worshiping the god of religious colonizers. Or they'll convert to Islam. It's hard to say. But there are lots of ways this can play out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Fair enough. Just that coming from a fundie place I think the cognitive backflips might hold. Tho I hope you're right π permalink fedilink source parent [β] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) That'd be... nice... but no. When it come to homophobia, people hate what they don't understand and then come up with reasons to justify it, not the other way around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Misanthropy tbh Hate has a material basis, it's not just something that emerges organically from human nature. The ruling class needs to maximize the reproduction of labor so it invented and promoted queer hate as a way to remove one of those obstacles. Its material basis is actually very similar to anti-abortion and anti-contraception and anti-feminist politics. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe, but they view their religion as native, not foreign. And those have built in homophobia in the doctrine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children) Doctrine and religion are always changing based on historical forces, so if the historical winds are blowing against "lgbt=colonialism" then this will have effects on religion and doctrine. The contradiction will need to be resolved somehow. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Contradiction with religious folk is often boiled down to "if I don't believe the contradiction exists then it must not exist!" Source: whenever anyone brings up contradictions in the Bible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* I'm talking about contradictions that can arise between religion and politics. If their religion says to be charitable to the poor, but their politics say to starve the poor, they'll starve the poor. If their religion says to love their neighbor, but their politics tells them to hate their neighbor, they'll hate their neighbor. When there's a contradiction between religion and politics, they'll choose politics and then work backwards from there to justify it religiously. permalink fedilink source parent [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I get what your saying, but I'm adding that even independently of that they follow abrahamic religions and that is homophobic. On one hand there is a niew of neo colonialism and on the other you might be asking them to be more secular. Both are very steep and somewhat independent hills. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Abrahamic religion isn't set in stone, it's capable of reform and has even done so in other historical contexts. This doesn't even require secularism, all it requires is that they read their books in a different way for different interpretations. But secularism isn't impossible. As the colonizers become less secular and more religious, the historical currents begin to push against religion among the colonized. Perhaps less so among Muslims because they can deflect the contradictions onto sectarianism against the Christian colonizers, but African Christians will have to reconcile the contradiction between their anti-colonialism and worshiping the god of religious colonizers. Or they'll convert to Islam. It's hard to say. But there are lots of ways this can play out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Fair enough. Just that coming from a fundie place I think the cognitive backflips might hold. Tho I hope you're right π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children) Doctrine and religion are always changing based on historical forces, so if the historical winds are blowing against "lgbt=colonialism" then this will have effects on religion and doctrine. The contradiction will need to be resolved somehow. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Contradiction with religious folk is often boiled down to "if I don't believe the contradiction exists then it must not exist!" Source: whenever anyone brings up contradictions in the Bible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* I'm talking about contradictions that can arise between religion and politics. If their religion says to be charitable to the poor, but their politics say to starve the poor, they'll starve the poor. If their religion says to love their neighbor, but their politics tells them to hate their neighbor, they'll hate their neighbor. When there's a contradiction between religion and politics, they'll choose politics and then work backwards from there to justify it religiously. permalink fedilink source parent [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I get what your saying, but I'm adding that even independently of that they follow abrahamic religions and that is homophobic. On one hand there is a niew of neo colonialism and on the other you might be asking them to be more secular. Both are very steep and somewhat independent hills. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Abrahamic religion isn't set in stone, it's capable of reform and has even done so in other historical contexts. This doesn't even require secularism, all it requires is that they read their books in a different way for different interpretations. But secularism isn't impossible. As the colonizers become less secular and more religious, the historical currents begin to push against religion among the colonized. Perhaps less so among Muslims because they can deflect the contradictions onto sectarianism against the Christian colonizers, but African Christians will have to reconcile the contradiction between their anti-colonialism and worshiping the god of religious colonizers. Or they'll convert to Islam. It's hard to say. But there are lots of ways this can play out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Fair enough. Just that coming from a fundie place I think the cognitive backflips might hold. Tho I hope you're right π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Contradiction with religious folk is often boiled down to "if I don't believe the contradiction exists then it must not exist!" Source: whenever anyone brings up contradictions in the Bible permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* I'm talking about contradictions that can arise between religion and politics. If their religion says to be charitable to the poor, but their politics say to starve the poor, they'll starve the poor. If their religion says to love their neighbor, but their politics tells them to hate their neighbor, they'll hate their neighbor. When there's a contradiction between religion and politics, they'll choose politics and then work backwards from there to justify it religiously. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* I'm talking about contradictions that can arise between religion and politics. If their religion says to be charitable to the poor, but their politics say to starve the poor, they'll starve the poor. If their religion says to love their neighbor, but their politics tells them to hate their neighbor, they'll hate their neighbor. When there's a contradiction between religion and politics, they'll choose politics and then work backwards from there to justify it religiously. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I get what your saying, but I'm adding that even independently of that they follow abrahamic religions and that is homophobic. On one hand there is a niew of neo colonialism and on the other you might be asking them to be more secular. Both are very steep and somewhat independent hills. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Abrahamic religion isn't set in stone, it's capable of reform and has even done so in other historical contexts. This doesn't even require secularism, all it requires is that they read their books in a different way for different interpretations. But secularism isn't impossible. As the colonizers become less secular and more religious, the historical currents begin to push against religion among the colonized. Perhaps less so among Muslims because they can deflect the contradictions onto sectarianism against the Christian colonizers, but African Christians will have to reconcile the contradiction between their anti-colonialism and worshiping the god of religious colonizers. Or they'll convert to Islam. It's hard to say. But there are lots of ways this can play out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Fair enough. Just that coming from a fundie place I think the cognitive backflips might hold. Tho I hope you're right π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child) Abrahamic religion isn't set in stone, it's capable of reform and has even done so in other historical contexts. This doesn't even require secularism, all it requires is that they read their books in a different way for different interpretations. But secularism isn't impossible. As the colonizers become less secular and more religious, the historical currents begin to push against religion among the colonized. Perhaps less so among Muslims because they can deflect the contradictions onto sectarianism against the Christian colonizers, but African Christians will have to reconcile the contradiction between their anti-colonialism and worshiping the god of religious colonizers. Or they'll convert to Islam. It's hard to say. But there are lots of ways this can play out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Fair enough. Just that coming from a fundie place I think the cognitive backflips might hold. Tho I hope you're right π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Fair enough. Just that coming from a fundie place I think the cognitive backflips might hold. Tho I hope you're right π permalink fedilink source parent
[β] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) That'd be... nice... but no. When it come to homophobia, people hate what they don't understand and then come up with reasons to justify it, not the other way around. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Misanthropy tbh Hate has a material basis, it's not just something that emerges organically from human nature. The ruling class needs to maximize the reproduction of labor so it invented and promoted queer hate as a way to remove one of those obstacles. Its material basis is actually very similar to anti-abortion and anti-contraception and anti-feminist politics. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago Misanthropy tbh Hate has a material basis, it's not just something that emerges organically from human nature. The ruling class needs to maximize the reproduction of labor so it invented and promoted queer hate as a way to remove one of those obstacles. Its material basis is actually very similar to anti-abortion and anti-contraception and anti-feminist politics. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] burgerchurgarr@lemmus.org 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) Funny that you bring that up. Most of Africa and West Asia got colonized when Victorian England was at its prudest point. They "civilizedβ the "savages" and taught them their Victorian moral values. This has a lasting influence until today. While you consider yourself civilized and educated and those others are the backwards ideas, in reality while your ancestors were living off their wealth they had the capacity to think about luxury like human rights (Iβm sorry, it shouldnβt be a luxury, but it is), while the colonized were busy trying to survive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* while the colonized were busy trying to survive. Still are unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent
[β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* while the colonized were busy trying to survive. Still are unfortunately permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Alright, Iβll admit this is a plan for a story Iβm writing to help define who the bad guys are: They hate the neighboring country, and homosexuality. They use puritanical thinking to frame the latter as an evil invention of the former; βThe men there are so fowl and heartless, they hate all forms of femininity, and prefer to bond with other demons like themselves. The women feel forced to find love with each other.β Iβm starting to get curious if any one particular country might feel offended at my story when I someday write it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Doesn't feel like a specific call out. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Doesn't feel like a specific call out. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Korne127@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Viewing accepting and supporting people that are different as (neo-)colonialism is just dumb. They deserve to be seen as equal and live a happy life there as much as anywhere else. Being African doesn't excuse you for being an asshole. permalink fedilink source parent
