this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
362 points (98.4% liked)
Political Humor
1347 readers
704 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I've been charting "The Establishment", mapping out players, structure, hierarchy, methods, key dates, anything else I can, like property assets and visitors. The Epstein files are a key weakness, as are the unredacted flight logs. They are the most revealing look we have at the organization itself. In fact, the "Social" branch in which Epstein and Maxwell were key players, represents the intersection of all the other parts (5 parts, including military-industrial-intelligence and finance). Radical exposure here could be the crack in the door to the whole operation. Israel and our special relationship is the key to the engine room of the criminal enterprise we only loosely know as The Establishment. It's a giant interdependent network of corruption, but laying it all out, there's probably less than 100 people to put pressure on. I think a multi-prong attack combining radical exposure, targeted RICO lawsuits, and funding challengers is the plan to go with. The goal is the severance of the "special relationship" with Israel. It'd be really nice if we could just use direct democracy to say, "no, I would not much like to fund genocide, thank you." It seems like the tables are tilted, but they're really not. Maintaining the secretive infrastructure is expensive, as are any leaks in exposure. These people have names, and though I can't seem to penetrate the intelligence wing of this operation (Epstein and Maxwell are already exposed), we know who can. I say it's time to waterboard everyone even loosely tied to this thing, but we do a lot of people with may more resources than me going at this in smart "civil" ways.
Looking forward to your article/video/post about it.
It's either going to be illuminating or the funniest schizo post that week
It seems about 70/30 the wrong way right now. But there are key points I like.
Less than 100 people with outsized influence sounds like it could be true.