946
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 155 points 11 months ago

Anyone who has projects on Github they care about, you might wanna move it to self-hosting or another git host while you still can, because once MS gets tired of killing e-mails, Github repos are probably going to start getting sniped next.

[-] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 70 points 11 months ago

Even if you stay on GitHub, definitely mirror to another host. Git is designed to be distributed, why not make use of that capability!

[-] MITM0@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So either Codeberg, Sourcehut or Gitlab ??

If you want to quit Git entirely then Fossil which has a built-in GUI & a fully-fledged alternative to both Git & Github & is self-hostable or Darcs/Pijul which are Patch-oriented

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago

They probably meant purely self hosted. You can self hosted Gitea, Forgejo, GitLab, and probably many others.

[-] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago

git (by itself) is no harder to host than SSH.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't say it is particularly easy to setup, not easier than using a Docker image at least.

[-] msage@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Gitea (and hopefully Forgejo as well) really is.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

I can vouch for Forgejo, it is pretty easy.

[-] PushButton@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I host my main repository on my "lab server" at home, I got a copy on codeberg, and my public repo are mirrored on github.

I specify in the github description that's a mirror with a link to codeberg.

Github is the little outcast kid of the bunch...

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 6 points 11 months ago

Self-hosted GitLab is what GNOME and Debian chose to do.

I still use the main GitLab for most things.

https://repo.or.cz/ provides just git hosting.

It's also relatively easy to just self-host Git, though permissions can be wonky, at least last time I tried.

I can't recommend Darcs. Luckily I don't see MS (or any other corp) being able to take over core Git development. I really should try Pijul again, but least time I played with it, the history/branch visualization (which you can do without, but I really like to have) was actually still worse than Darcs.

[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 3 points 11 months ago

Or self-host if that's feasible, MAS has been self-hosting for a while now, for example.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

Oh man, I hate the whole git system so much, it was like the worst part of coding.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
946 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

86563 readers
3202 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS