26
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Which, we knew. It's why we shouldn't run out to replace ice with ev but if you're in the market for a new vehicle, then go ev. Plus this is an old old argument from conservatives, it's been proven many times that the environmental impacts are offset after a year or so of driving compared to driving ICE

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The article talks specifically about an EV battery plant in Nevada has drained all of the water and destroyed habitats. I don't think that's going to be offset by people driving EVs.

But that's not necessarily an inherent issue with EV batteries; it's an issue with that particular battery maker having a poor environmental policy. It's not the same as burning coal, where you can do it a little less bad but pollution is essentially unavoidable in the process.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
26 points (100.0% liked)

Green Energy

3148 readers
108 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS