283
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Why did they historically not go further east?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago

They did, at least into Minnesota. This range map probably doesn't use data from as long ago as when they did.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I was definitely thinking the time (and method) of this data collection. It kind of appears to reflect US western expansion.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Pure guess, but the praries are probably not a good habitat for them. Hard for them to hunt, and the buffalos could easily mess them up.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah trees and mountains make sense. Like the Sierra range in California / Nevada. Or the Rockies. But that map shows way down into Mexico where I imagine it is pretty flat and trees are not as dense (which i guess is kind of similar to a prairie?) Interesting point on the buffalo, i can see that.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
283 points (99.0% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4865 readers
267 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS