you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    I don’t know how to explain it, but all fake linocut/woodblock print images are kind of samey in a way that sticks out when you see it, compared to linocut/woodblock prints by artists.

    It’s almost always this same background color/texture in generated images too, whereas with real prints you might have paper that looks very different even if it’s that exact color. And plenty of artists go wild with the paper and ink colors.

    It’s not just one thing, it’s a lot of little things that give it a bad vibe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    I think it's a couple different things possibly? The eye is weird. The fingers and toes are weird. The belly is weird. The positioning of the so-called anus is pretty far off from where it should be and pointing the wrong direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Keep complaining while you can, in 5 or 10 years you really won't be able to tell anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    But then it won't matter. The problem is that this looks like ass and didn't need to be made with an AI image generator. It could easily be made with any free word processor and a picture of an embryo found anywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    they said that about synthesizers. You can still tell 40+ years later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The rate of progress on image generation is on another level. Image generation models have gone from incoherent fever dream to near perfect in 5 years. In 5 or 10 more years I absolutely believe even us who know what to look for won't be able to tell reliably.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments