355
Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 64 points 2 days ago

People who cheer when southern kids die in a natural disaster because it will hurt their parents, who might have voted Trump: why won’t these stupid fucks vote for my team?

[-] [email protected] 49 points 2 days ago

People do that? That is insanely sad and nonempatheic.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago

Sadly yes, I kept running into it on Lemmy in the immediate aftermath of the Texas floods. I wish it was hyperbole, but if you look in threads about any natural disaster in southern states before mods do clean up it’s all ‘get what you voted for’, like children and people who voted for what you wanted (or even can’t legally vote!) aren’t also dying.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago

Not even just natural disasters, either. I've seen people(across the 'net and, sadly, in person) lump Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama together like we all voted the exact same way, like it's our faults that laws and restrictions get made.

So many of us have fought, tried changing minds, voted in our own favor, fucking tried, and guess what we got? Told it's our faults. Told by our "leaders" that we're practically better off dead in their eyes. Watched them fight to make us as miserable as possible, every way they can, and have had to etch our own niches wherever we can.

It's absolutely demoralizing. People on both sides want to keep screaming you're doing it wrong when all we're trying to do at this point is fucking survive long enough to maybe get to smile once as ourselves before we die.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

I get where you're coming from and it's probably one of the biggest things that alienates me from the left.

Don't get me wrong, I still vote for and support leftist policies, but I personally find many of the people who also vote for leftist policies to just be generally terrible people when you put them into a group.

For some reason they tend to go crabs in a bucket and start hating on and shitting on everything and only really rejoicing when people on the right suffer, And while I can comprehend why that happens, I can't ally myself with that portion of the left.

For me, the most annoying thing is when something gets a little bit better.

Inevitably, a leftist will pop out and complain how it's not perfect, how it's not good enough, and how stupid it is. It's the most annoying thing on the planet.

When things got better, and things are on the mend, like, celebrate the successes, fuck.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

I’ve wanted to do an effort post on this but I’m both unsure of where to put it and not sure I have enough coherent thoughts to justify it. But to me it comes off like a lot of the people you’re describing are either young (grew up under the prosperity and social acceptance of the Obama admin) or have never lived in a conservative area. They have no real metric for what trying to get the vote out and get people registered is actually like in an area where you’re up against a Good Ol’ Boy network that goes back over a century and hamstrung at every corner by gerrymandering, regressive laws, and sometimes the actual state government just straight up overturning whatever you voted into law.

I can only hope it’s that they are deeply ignorant of the realities of it, because the alternative is that they swallow the just world fallacy hook, line, and sinker; ‘my state isn’t Republican because we’re morally superior, their state is Republican because they’re inferior and deserve what happens to them.’

And because of having never had to confront or fight the way these Republicans are now operating at the national level, they have no idea how to deal with it. They have never had to, on a social and political level, hunker down and endure. They have no idea how to deal with despair and grief or to find joy and calm when everything sucks. And if you stay like that for too long, it will kill you.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Exactly: Things got worse slowly, then quickly. Why can't they get better that way too?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Exactly: Things got worse slowly, then quickly. Why can't they get better that way too?

They do.

Look at the rise of gay rights. It happened very slowly, then suddenly. Now most Republicans accept gay people’s existence.

The thing is, there’s never not something to progress on. We can always improve society. And the people trying to hold that back will always fight back. So it sometimes feels like we don’t make progress.

But we absolutely make progress. It isn’t always smooth, it isn’t always consistent, but lots of hard data shows human existence getting better. Millions fewer children died in 2024 than in 1984. A smaller percentage of humans starved to death. A smaller percentage of humans died of treatable diseases.

Don’t let despair take you. Keep fighting, and society marches on.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because a lot of people do not share the same criteria for what counts as "getting better".

The state apparatus making concessions to the working class while failing to restructure ownership over the means of production, essentially keeping them reliant to the system that is exploiting them and thus complacent to the demands of the owning class less they risk losing what little they have, is not what a leftist would call "progress"

A slave is still a slave even in a gilded cage.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Because nobody's killing the bastards making them worse.

Edit: and they can't/won't be negotiated with.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I won't say the left doesnt, but that's more a lib thing.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

If you know what I'm talking about then the specific (left/liberal/whatever) label isn't as important. It's that group of people who have a general idea that things should be fair and equal for everyone but have clearly defined groups of people that are more equal than others.

Its those people who treat middle aged and older white guys like shit online and cheer when bad things happen to them as soon as they find out they are wealthy or republican. They laugh when a person gets deported because their spouse voted for trump. They dogpile on the shitty comments and hateful rhetoric as soon as someone says something that identifies that person as not being in line with the current politic and cheer when well intentioned potential allies who made an oopsie get destroyed.

I get it, it's revenge, its personal outrage with a good reason leaking out of people who have been hurt, but it's too indiscriminate and unable to attempt communication before condemnation.

Like the outrage over Hilary Clinton calling trump supporters a basket of deplorables. They are, and I hate them, each and every one of them, with a passion. I would gladly watch them all drown knowing that I am in arms reach to save them like a Phil Collins song.

But... Hillary did not have the communication skills, the charisma, the charm, or the backing of the people to pull that off in a meaningful way. She hit a hornets nest with a stick when she should have left it alone. Now, 10 years later they still proudly call themselves deplorable and intentionally do deplorable things in part because they have accepted the moniker.

Hillary didn't cause the problem, but she gave it a name and a banner and a rallying cry from a position of untouchable smugness with a personal feeling of superiority and we have been paying for that one sentence for a decade now with no sign of it stopping.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It does a bit? I havent seen a lib who doesnt do it, tankies are pretty divided. Trots are overwhelmingly not into it, anarchists and democratic socialista will someti-

Oh i thought you were talking about hating on innocent people because of where they live, not the guilty or their intimates. Like celebrating a maggot's wife behing deported, even if you're sad for the lady who got disappeared to a federal rape dungeon.

hilary clinton

Okay i need to read further to know if I'm gonna laugh or be outraged, but those are the only reasonable responses to her. Looks like cringe. My fault; forgot about cringe.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

This is beside your very well made point, but: I avoid using the word “deplorable” specifically because of the connotation Hillary gave it.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

No, it's hyperbolic misrepresenting of a generalized statement as being all-encompassing instead of understanding that exceptions to the statement exist.

"You get what you voted for" is obviously directed at those who voted for Trump, not the children or those who voted otherwise.

Unfortunately, people are prone to tie their identity to arbitrary concepts, so when people say things like "People from [Insert State here] get what they voted for", they take offense at having something they identify with be associated with something they don't approve of instead of understanding that they aren't the people being mentioned by the statement.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Bruh just this MORNING, on Lemmy, under an article about Kerrville rejecting emergency management funding from the Biden admin, there was this comment:

"Children of Republican parents grow up to become Republican voters"

YES it was in context with the Camp Mystic deaths. YES it had upvotes.

And it was so fucking disgusting to see.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

"You get what you voted for" is still a horrendously fucking ghoulish thing to say in the aftermath of a natural disaster. Even with all your piss poor excuses. Be better.

I'm not from that area. I'm not a Republican. I'm a grown ass adult and parent voting Democrat, living in a blue state. My frustration with this shit ass take has nothing to do with "misunderstanding the target". You, and others saying this shit right now, are being shit human beings.


Are we going to argue that Obama drone striking civilians in the Middle East, or the absurd expansion of the surveillance state under his watch also falls under "get what you voted for"? What about Trump's "drain the swamp" that clearly didn't happen? The point being that politicians lie, gerrymander, and do all sorts of other bullshit that makes things more complicated than "vote for right person, experience no hardships or problems ever".

Are we going to pretend that Republicans winning in that area somehow means that every single adult living there voted Republican?


Go get your scope zeroed in properly. Go after the politicians directly responsible for this mess, not the poor fucks dealing with the aftermath and dead children.

Because what a lot of people read when you say "You get what you voted for" is "dead children are a cause for gloating when it happens in a Republican controlled area". It's explicitly what you folks are doing, so stop pretending you mean anything fucking respectable.

This wasn't a common talking point/repeated phrase (sentiment showed up from time to time, but this specific phrase? No) in these conversations until these kids died. So this "we're not gloating about dead kids" shit doesn't ring true to a lot of people.

Don't bother with your mental gymnastics to try and excuse your shit on my account. I've heard it all already and it doesn't make what you all are doing ok.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

Yeah, fuck those guys.

If you’re celebrating mass death you are a problem full stop.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

"They chose this"

Ah yes, the drowned children and the women carrying ectopic embryos and the detainees all down to a man chose this by voting. Sure.

There's an empathy shortage on this planet and its gonna drive us extinct. People on this site delight in the suffering of faceless unknown Americans like my grandparents delighting in Christendom's pillaging of the heathen Middle Eastern countries because "they chose wrong," that choice being non Christian and non-white.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, folks need to remember collective punishment is a war crime for a reason.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

They vote for Trump to own the libs. Dont make it more complicated than it is.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Agreed. The generalized FAFO needs to stop. Only 20% of Texans voted for Trump. Natural disasters don’t discriminate.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

But isn't it just sweeping the root cause under the rug until the next inevitable disaster? If you don't remind them that it's their doing, they will definitely ignore it and do the same thing again, with the same tragic results. I don't know if reminding helps really, but keeping silence about it definitely doesn't.
When a child hurts itself, you need to establish cause and effect relationship in their head, otherwise they will hurt themselves again

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

How does the left reveling in the demise of Texans convince Texans to join the left?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If you think in this categories, then it doesn't matter, the cause is already lost. If it's "The Left vs Texans" then yeah, nothing will help.
But, next time some disconnected idiot from Texas asks "why should I vote Democrats" you can point them out all the cases when not doing so hurt them specifically. This is what you called reveling in their demise.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

You’re changing the point. I said we should stop with generalized FAFO. As in, we should not be poking fun or finding joy in people suffering the consequences of their vote. If we lose our humanity, we’re no better than those we oppose.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

No, that was my point all along, you just refuse to see it. We need more generalized FAFO, we need to never shut up about it. It is not the same as mocking people for their misery, and it's not done for joy (nor that it actually joyful, beyound the regular schadenfreude). It was very specific and very important purpose. A lot of those people can't learn unless the example punches them in the face. They can't feel empathy for other people, so they need to always be reminded that sometimes leopards are eating their faces. Asking them nicely didn't help, never did.
Unless we make the idea that their misery is directly correlated with their choices, they will all make the same choices again, and they don't seem to be susceptible to new info when they're not miserable.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

So you believe the best way to convince people to not be sociopathic towards their fellow countrymen is to treat them with the same callousness, devoid of empathy?

You should really hold off on raising children until you understand human nature better.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Only 20% of Texans voted for Trump.

17.5 million people can potentially vote in Texas.

6.3 million voted Trump.

4.8 million voted against Trump.

Leaving 6.4 million who are fine with Trump.

So, 12.7 out of 17.5 are either supporters or totally OK with it. That's 73% who didn't want to oppose this.

That still doesn't mean the other 1 in 4 deserves this, of course. But the "20%" number is bullshit.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Leaving 6.4 million who are fine with Trump.

Fucking incredible that nobody in Texas had their vote suppressed. 🙄

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Texans means people of Texas, which is ~31.3M. Natural disasters don’t care if you’re a registered voter.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The response kind of does however

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
355 points (94.7% liked)

196

3882 readers
1534 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS