you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

Death rates aren't a feeling. I want some hard numbers.

I feel like we just don't care if we live or die anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Fun fact: the CDC readjusted what the 'normal' rate of deaths is to include the years of the pandemic so now it's harder than ever to find hard numbers because "excess deaths" was one of the last ways to get any information at all!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Plus a world wide fast aging population would increase the death background number even if nothing else happens.

    Anything that doesn't make an observable, statistically significant difference, has no cause to further impose restriction on how people live their lives

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    Plus a world wide fast aging population would increase the death background number even if nothing else happens.

    Sharp edges don't happen from demographic trends. This is pure rationalization.

    Further than what?? What restrictions??

    And what are you implying? Covid has no observable affect on public health? Tell that to the millions of people still getting disabled every year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I know I've read reports about the latest variants being much less deadly. I did see one study recently which for patients presenting to hospital covid was a few percentage points more likely to result in death compared to hospitalized flu patients. There were a lot more covid patients though.

    Found it:

    death rates among people hospitalized for COVID-19 were 17% to 21% in 2020 vs 6% in this study, while death rates for those hospitalized for influenza were 3.8% in 2020 vs 3.7% in this study

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2803749

    So there is some data backing up the feelings I've gotten from everything I've been hearing and seeing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    So that's almost twice as bad as the flu.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I mean, that's one way to look at it. I looked at it as only a couple percent higher death rate than the flu. Either way, a little less than 2x is way better than like 5x worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Obviously it's better than before, but it's also worth keeping in mind these deaths are in addition to the flu.

    Also, there are good and bad flu seasons. I see no reason for COVID to not be the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Even if we pedantically accept that 'almost double' is really 'just a few percent higher' while we're looking at a single digit likelihood, 'just a few percent more' than for the flu is a lot more people in overall numbers with something that spreads far quicker than the flu. We could get the death rate of Covid down to ½ the rate for the flu but if infections are more than double (this is just an example, I don't know the actual stats on this one), it still means Covid would be more deadly. Unless I'm missing something obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure how severe an effect this would have on the numbers, but the death rate would non-negligibly go down after millions of the most vulnerable people died in the first wave. As well, the newer variants get more contagious and bypass immune responses more easily, and we're taking way fewer precautions as a society. so 6% is a lower percent but still an incredibly high number

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I saw it as an evolutionary benefit to be less deadly. The way I'm seeing this, the virus's purpose in life is to spread, so a higher infection and contagious rate with less death rate is ideal from an evolution standpoint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    That's fair, but I think you can still compare it to the flu, which is not that far off from covid percentage wise. At this point both the flu and covid should be at an equal level of people having vaccines and natural antibodies, right? Even if you go with covid being about twice as deadly as the flu, twice as deadly as almost nothing is still almost nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Hundreds of thousands of Americans will die this year from COVID. Sure, almost nothing. Just a 9/11 every two weeks or so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Thousands die every day from tons of other stuff also, just a part of life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    That reality is reality? People die of lots of different things, I'm sorry I'm that's news to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's the problem that people like you let this be reality. That we just dismiss millions of preventable deaths as mere statistics rather than doing simple and easy things like wearing masks during pandemics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments