108
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago

Always wondered why “dress for the slide, not the ride” didn’t apply to bicycles.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

You are the power source for your travel on a bike, you need to be able to dump heat. Also generally the top speed isn't all that high

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

I mean, I have worn some pretty breathable crotch rocket gear in the middle of summer. I get where everyone is coming from with needing to dissipate heat from a human powered mode of transportation, and keep it as light as possible, but simply saying “no protection cause speed must be fast” is just not a phrase that makes sense with today’s and tomorrow’s technology and textiles.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

In cycle racing that's all of it, they cannot wear protective gear as it would slow them down and they would lose to people who don't wear it

In recreational cycling it hardly matters, speeds aren't all that high.

My experience with heat is different to yours. In winter I wear shorts and short sleeves and gloves. In summer it's the same but the gloves don't have fingers.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

First thing I thought of was all it takes is one person not wearing it to gain an advantage and everyone else will follow.

This is a sport where people take EPO to increase red blood cells and it thickens to blood so much it can cause heart disease, stroke, and cerebral or pulmonary embolism. They voluntarily train for a 21 day torture test totaling ~3500km going up mountains and at the end look like survivors of famine.

If they could remove some organs and add a third lung with a 50% chance of survival, they'd do it.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

In cycle racing that's all of it, they cannot wear protective gear as it would slow them down and they would lose to people who don't wear it

it could just be made mandatory, like in other sports with protective gear.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Yes, that is the OP article's point is

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

@psud @snekerpimp honestly the gravel rash you can get at 40kmph is pretty significant, and hills to get that much speed aren't weird.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

My experience is on recumbent bikes where you're not falling far and not going over the handlebars. I think the most skin I have abraded was in a 50kph crash on concrete and grass where about a 2cm circle of the skin over the thumb mound of my left palm was gone. That would have been prevented by gloves

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

@psud I really should try a recumbent bike one day, I enjoyed my trike but the bikes always scared me. But I should give one a try.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

It took a few hours on a grassy hill to learn to balance it

My fast bike is an M5 carbon high racer

It got too easy to ride, also I don't trust carbon composites to last a long time in Australian sunlight, so I also now have a steel (CrMo) shockproof 559

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

@psud I got enough skin taken off my knee at 20kmph to make dancing at my wedding 6 weeks later sketchy.

Although that was gravel.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I reckon if the sports organisations required pro cyclists to wear protective gear it'll be more common for amateurs to also use PPE and make that stuff easier to get

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

But it kind of is? The Tour de France is really a different beast from you riding around - they are averaging at over 41km/h for the whole tour with all those brutal climbs. You can imagine how fast they are going at flat sections. They are reaching 100km/h+ at descents.

But even for me as a unfit guy the speeds can get crazy. If I go down the hills around here and if I do not brake, I will reach 70km/h+ easily. Which is kind of insane just wearing a helmet and short lycra clothes.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I can pedal my carbon fibre recumbent up to 53km/h on the flat, and I pass cars in a 70kmh zone on a downhill exit ramp, so yeah speeds can get pretty high. It would be good if cycle racing organisations required road racers to wear appropriate PPE so ventilated protective gear could get into the general population and be seen as reasonable

OTOH I don't think riders of slow bikes should be required to even wear helmets (they are required to in Australia)

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

At the pro level, adding 100 watts to your apparel just won't work.

For commuters, reducing comfort, increasing sweat, and spending more just doesn't fly. It's hard enough to get people to wear helmets.

Same as above for recreational riders.

I say that as someone who wore full on motorcycle equipment while riding an e-scooter that could go 50km/h, but I kept it legal at under 25 km/h. Overkill to the max.

It's challenging enough to dress comfortably and without sweating too much while cycling normally. I can't imagine adding an armored jacket or pants to the mix. MTB and downhill riders do wear stuff like that, though.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Change the rules, the sport will adapt as will the training adapt to the changes in equipment.

I agree it's a bit dumb but they're absolutely cooking out there. If they want it, let them have it, or those that want to, allow them to.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

If safety equipment was mandatory at the pro level like it is on MTB, everyone would have that added increase. More research and development would go into lighter, breathable, rip proof fabric and lightweight, aerodynamic hard protection. Sure, time would go down, but I don’t see why you should sacrifice safety and health for a few seconds off your times.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

If safety equipment was mandatory at the pro level like it is on MTB, everyone would have that added increase.

I do agree. More equipment = fewer people getting into the sport. And if you do it for road, then you have to do it for gravel races...

It's a tough call. I guess if a large number of pros want it, then it should be done.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The downside to time cost is nobody will every break the records of old. (though we also know that in the past drugs, blood doping, and other things that are not allowed was done so breaking records may not be possible anyway)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

(Now is “the past” of tomorrow 😉)

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Na there will be a beast in 15 years that'll come out of nowhere to smash it with pads on and set a new standard.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
108 points (97.4% liked)

Bicycling

2806 readers
146 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS