231
"Superior" level (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 77 points 1 day ago

If he was rational, he would understand that companies like this have a huge incentive to inflate the score of anyone participating.

If he had got an 87, do you think that he would have posted his score?

Absolutely not, then the company would not get free advertising, costing them business.

I don't believe it is fully fake, but I would not be surprised to see them rounding up any edge cases, this goes for the entire industry

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I tried some free test once and got something like 90 lol

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

I’m pretty sure being of average intelligence (as far a test with its own flaws and limitations can tell) is nothing to be ashamed of, just like being of average height is nothing to be ashamed of.

I took one when I was a kid and got a 136, and I feel like an idiot fairly regularly. I don’t think these tests a definitive measures of intellectual “superiority”

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

It what you do with what you've got that counts.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have taken free tests when I have been bored, I have got results within the range of 80 to 120, safe to say, I don't have a lot of trust in them...

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I took a test as a kid and 30 years later and they both said 114. Honestly did not expect that.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

For all the posturing some people you meet in daily life do about "being smart", I think most of us are pretty damn average. Most people still have the capacity to accomplish anything they want (within reason) if they're willing to put in enough time and effort on a consistent basis.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I think most of us are pretty damn average.

That's true. Like, by definition.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Has more to do with the distribution than the definition. If everyone were either a moron or genius, nobody would be average without changing the definition.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago
load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
231 points (98.7% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

5030 readers
1423 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS