35
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ok, here’s a hot take. I’m avidly against generative AI. But I’m not against using LLMs to help assist with coding. Jetbrains offers a free LLM (they have a separate paid AI service too) to help with code completion, and it’s fairly good for repetitive stuff. It’s also hosted locally on your machine and not a cloud service.

That said, if people want to write boilerplate/template code with AI, fine. But it must be edited, tweaked, and reviewed by a human. This is no different than blindly copying and pasting from places like StackOverflow. You need to know and understand what’s being presented to you so you can know and understand what it’s going to do in your application.

Edit: forgot to lament that writing code is not the time-consuming part. It’s the editing, tweaking, and reviewing process that is. But what do I know? I’ve only been doing this for ~20 years professionally. 🤷‍♂️

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I don't disagree with having it help out a little or be better at autocomplete but having worked with Databricks's Genie or whatever it's called I am just now annoyedly hitting backspace when it suggests something stupid again but enter also autocompletes rather than just tab.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I get it. As much as I love autocomplete, it’s not perfect. I like the LLM, but I’ve never used (nor do I plan to) an AI service.

Though I’ve been toying with the idea of creating my own local LLM. Maybe that would be better than Copilot or those other public services. 🤷‍♂️

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
35 points (97.3% liked)

Programming Circlejerk

211 readers
3 users here now

Community to talk about enlightened programming takes

Rules:

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS