I don't understand the appeal of "multipolarity" (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Personally, I fail to see why many Marxist-Leninists support multipolarity. The primary goal of the Leninist movements has always been "workers of the world unite!" and not "non-US-aligned countries unite!".

To be clear, in saying this, I am not endorsing US-led unipolarity. I am just saying that multipolarity is not inherently good as some MLs suggest. For example, the world in 1914 and 1939 were without a doubt multipolar, and those both resulted in brutal world wars which killed millions.

Could somebody explain why people support multipolarity so much?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago

Well, I never said it would be peaceful. Haha

But imperialism wouldn't exist to enforce its will militarily. I do believe that isolated capitalist states wouldn't be able to prevent socialism, with few exceptions. They prevent socialism through a unipolar domination of power.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025

20 points (81.2% liked)

Leftist Infighting: A community dedicated to allowing leftists to vent their frustrations

1420 readers

2 users here now

The purpose of this community is sort of a "work out your frustrations by letting it all out" where different leftist tendencies can vent their frustrations with one another and more assertively and directly challenge one another. Hostility is allowed, but any racist, fascist, or reactionary crap wont be tolerated, nor will explicit threats.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]