50
What can I say except 
They've been raging and pissing themselves over this for days across multiple subs.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
564 readers
211 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
LoRAs ("Low-Rank Adaptations") are like small modular chunks that get tacked onto a generative AI model to introduce additional concepts, fine tune some aspect of it, etc, in a way that's generic enough that they work within a given family of checkpoints and sometimes across it within the same base model. Like something derived from SDXL might work with any other SDXL LoRA but probably won't because of the changes the major finetune strains of it made when retraining it (Pony XL, a notorious porn checkpoint derived from SDXL that spawned an entire ecosystem of further finetunes, in particular completely fried something and is incompatible with everything else).
In this case they're throwing a fit about Flux Kontext (a new finetune of Flux that's focused on image to image edits I believe? That's what I've inferred anyways) LoRAs designed for image-to-image edits to remove clothes are being removed from every major hosting site because they violate site policy and/or the law.