215
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Source: OAG Data

Interesting that California's was higher than Florida/Texas until 2007 and 2015.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Does “per 100,000” refer to the entire population, or the population under 25? If the former, could some of the differences be accounted for by changing demographics?

That’s what age-adjustment prevents.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

So if I understand that right, the “per 100,000” figures aren’t for the exact populations, but for what the populations would be if the age groups were re-weighted to keep the age demographics constant?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Right, it imposes the collected data on a chosen model population. I wish it told you what that population was, but I don’t see it.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
215 points (99.1% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21762 readers
568 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS