1
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1 points (55.6% liked)
China, 中国
1011 readers
1 users here now
English
This is a forum dedicated to China, Chinese culture Chinese language, and Chinese people.
Rules:
- Be civil, be respectful, don't attack other users
- No racism, sinophobia, or other bigotry allowed
- No misinformation
- Follow all other Lemmy rules
中文
这是一个专门讨论中国、中国文化、中国语言和中国人的论坛。
规则:
- 要文明，要尊重，不要攻击其他用户
- 不允许有种族主义、仇视中国人或其他偏执行为
- 不允许故意提供错误信息
- 遵守 Lemmy 的所有其他规则
Related communities / 相关的互联网论坛
Community icon by CustomDesign on MYICONFINDER, licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
These people were wrongly criminalized! According to their country's laws? Well no, according to totally undefined """international standards""". Are we going to apply those standards to, for instance, checking whether people imprisoned in the US are 'wrongly criminalized'? Of course not.
After checking the most recent ten pages of articles, out of 120 entries there were five about the US, not a single one of which had anything to do with the indiscriminate mass arrests of immigrants. There are as many unique news stories about the new law in Georgia requiring foreign NGOs to disclose their sources of funding, as there are about the US in total. If you search 'ICE', there is one (1) article that mentions it in the headline, which when sorted by 'Most Relevant' is the NINTH article to appear, and which is complaining about the National Guard mobilization against the protests against ICE, not even ICE itself.
"Amnesty International" is an attack dog of the US State Department that has no purpose but to generate headlines bashing the enemies of the Empire, with the very occasional half-hearted jab at the most obviously inexcusable crimes of the US and Europe to maintain their cover as some sort of impartial third-party. On their 'Take Action' page, "Join the fight for freedom [sic] in Hong Kong" is displayed before "Lift the blockade on Gaza and stop the genocide", which should tell you everything you need to know about their priorities.
Amnesty International Exposes Human Rights Violations at El Paso Immigrant Detention Facility May 14, 2025.
Matter of fact if you want to see them more critical of USA, there you go: Yemen: US Air Strike that has Left Dozens of Migrants Dead Must Be Investigated May 19, 2025.
If you want them to write more reports, consider supporting them, instead of complaining.
If you want Hong Kong to pass better national security laws, consider supporting the Chinese state financially, instead of complaining about their handling of domestic matters.
Your logic is very dumb and funny, but let me simplify it for you:
Supporting Amnesty = more reports and more research due to better funding.
Supporting CCP = more human rights abuses due to better funding.
I notice it's always the same vague term of "human rights abuses" when liberals breathlessly talk about "the CCP". Is there any reason you can't be specific, like how communists are specific about governments and policies we don't like? Like I get that the idea is to imply that there are just tooo many to name but that trick wears thin when you can never actually name them. You'll notice nobody here is talking about the zionist entity's "human rights abuses", we talk about it's ethnic cleansing and genocide. I live in the country with the world's biggest population of prison slaves, so I just say that. So please, what do you actually mean by "human rights abuses"?