22
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2436 readers
35 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
- Advocating violence is not allowed on Beehaw in general.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Citizens United did that. I'm just pointing out this is another sign that we cannot rely on the rule of law, nor constitutional protections.
Come again? Most of us are relying on these things.
If you are saying that there is no 100% guarantee, then of course I agree.
The Roberts court has consistently chipped away at fundamental rights that we take for granted. (see also: Dobbs)
Nationwide injunctions have been key to holding back the worst impulses of the junta, and now that's also off the table. Reliance on both is all well and good, but it doesn't match the reality of not knowing what rights we'll lose each SCOTUS term.
The only part of the Constitution that's guaranteed to last through this is the Second Amendment. The Fourth is out the window, and the 14th is looking shaky. Articles I and II are being ignored.
It will be left up to us (the people) as it always has.